Struggling with Mechanics? Get Help ASAP from an 18-Year-Old Finnish Student!

  • Thread starter joh
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Mechanics
In summary: I haven't got any idea of how to solve this one. It was a while ago I did this. You need to use the free body diagrams for the two masses. Note that the acceleration is the same for both masses so the accelerations are not independent.
  • #1
joh
5
0
I'm just going to start with a brief introduction of myself. I'm an 18 year-old high school student from Southern Finland, a country in Scandinavia, between Sweden and Russia.
Anyway, I'm on my last year in high school and was actually about to graduate this spring, however I hadn't completed enough courses to do that, so I'm graduating next autumn. I want to graduate asap, so I selected some courses I hadn't completed already, and one of these courses is Physics 5, it's basicly about mechanics, motion etc. etc.
Now, I'm REALLY bad at physics and math in general :blushing:, and in this course I haven't got a teacher, so I need to learn this stuff without help from the school, and if I get a 4 (our grades are from 4 to 10) in this course, I will have to do it all over again :eek:

So here comes the part where I need help, and I really need to understand how this works too, because I have 6 homework assignments that I need to figure out and complete, then April 3rd, which is in almost two weeks, I have to orally explain to the teacher how I completed these assignments, how they're calculated, why etc., and then of course there's the exam.

I would be REALLY grateful if some of you guys could help me out! :biggrin:

I'm going to be posting on a few other boards as well :tongue2:

I'll start with the two first assignments, I see that they're really simple basic mechanics, but there's still something I don't understand about them (I had my last physics course like 3 years ago). You have permission to laugh, I'm a newbie :rofl: and I don't really care about that anyway, so go ahead if you must :tongue2:



http://swear.1g.fi/files/phy/01.png

What I basicly understand from this is that the Second Law of Motion is in effect and some force of 350N is pushing the wagon forward while a force of 295N is decelerating the wagon. Then we also have gravity which is 9.81 and the mass 12kg. Oh, and the Third Law of Motion is also in effect, because gravity and then the mass of the wagon is pushing against the ground.

So basicly F = 55N, m = 12kg, g = 9.81

But then how do I calculate it, what's the formula? Am I missing some other variables?



http://swear.1g.fi/files/phy/02.png

Here Newton's Second Law of Motion is in effect again. There's two masses. m1 is accelerating while m2 is going upwards.
So basicly there's: m1 = 8kg, m2 = 6kg, g1 = 9.81, g2 = 9.81

I'm a bit confused here though. Again, how the heck do I calculate it, what's the formula? Am I missing something?



Cheers! :biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Apply Newton's 2nd law!
[tex]\vec{F}_{net} = \Sigma \vec{F} = m \vec{a}[/tex]

In the first problem, you have found the net force; use Newton's 2nd law to find the acceleration.

In the second problem, try applying Newton's 2nd law to each object separately and combine the equations to solve for the acceleration. (You can also treat the two masses as a single object and find the net force along its direction of motion.)

(Note: g is just the acceleration due to gravity, a constant. There's no "g1" or "g2", just g.)
 
  • #3
Welcome to Physics Forums joh. You're in quite an interesting situation, and we here are always happy to help interested people in understanding physics.

1. You've got it right. The second law does apply. The second law is in fact an equation that looks like [tex] F_{net} = ma[/tex].

Don't get confused with the gravity. With most problems like this, you have to 'break down' the forces into the x (horizontal) and y (vertical) directions. You see that gravity acts in the downward direction, meaning it is completely perpendicular to the forces pushing and pulling the cart.

All you need to do now is apply the summation of the two forces and plug it into that equation to find the acceleration!

2. This is a confusing problem to be done the first time in your head. Motion problems like these need to be tackled first by free body analysis. Physics doesn't offer a magical equation for every situation unfortunately. To be systematic, this is what I recommend. You have two equations you must set up. The first involves analyzing mass m1. Let up be considered positive and down be negative. The second law always applies, so let's start with that.

[tex]F =ma[/tex] (second law)

Looking at the forces acting on mass m1, we see that there are two. The tension of the rope pulling up and gravity down.
[tex]F_{net} = T + (-F_{gravity}) = m_1(-a) [/tex]
[tex]F_{net} = T - m_1g = m_1(-a) [/tex]

I have already assumed that m1 is accelerating in the downward direction.
For the second mass m2, we do something similar and get

[tex]F = T - F_{gravity} = m_2(a) [/tex]
[tex]F = T - m_2g = m_2(a) [/tex]

We know that because the two are connected through a rope the magnitude of the acceleration a must be the same. We have two unknowns, the tension T and the acceleration a. We have two equations though. Now let the review of solving simultaneous equations begin =)
 
  • #4
1. Newton's second law relates the acceleration that an object experiences as a result of the forces applied to it. More specific it will accelerate according to the netto force it experiences. The two forces opposes each other so the resultant of them is [itex]350 - 295 = 55\ N[/itex] to the right. The other forces that it experiences is its weight downward which is canceled by the normal force from the surface pushing it upwards just so hard as its weight is pulling it downwards. We know that these two forces cancel each out from Newton's second law other since the cart is not accelerating upward or downwards. The netto force is thus only the [itex]55\ N[/itex] force to the right - which will determine its acceleration according to
[tex]a=\frac{F_{net}}{m}[/tex]

2. The same principle holds for the two masses on the pulley. Since the two masses are connected together they are accelerating at the same rate. We can investigate each of the two masses separately with Newton's second law. Both of them will experience an upwards tension of the same magnitude (the masses pull on the rope and the rope pulls back - Newton's third law). The tensions that a massles rope experiences on its ends from the masses pulling on it need to be the same magnitude (these tensions are in opposite directions and will cancel each other out from Newton's second law [itex]T_{net}=ma=0a=0[/itex])
 
  • #5
Thanks for the help guys! I think I understand #1 now, but tell me if something is wrong here:

Normal equation for force
F = ma

The net force
350N - 295N = 55N

g & Newton III cancel each other out, so they are irrelevant in this assignment.

Here's what we got
F = 55N
m = 12kg


Equation for acceleration
a = F/m

And there we have it
a = 55N/12kg = 4.58m/s2 ~ 4.6m/s2



I still don't quite understand #2 though :confused:

The normal equation for force is F = ma, the only one of these variables we've got is mass (m1 & m2), to get the force we still need acceleration (a), how do we get it?

Now from what you've told me the acceleration for both objects is the same because they are tied together, m1 is accelerating downwards and there's two things contributing to this movement, namely gravity (9.81m/s2) and m1's mass (8.0kg), then there's one force that's decelerating it, m2's mass (6.0kg), then gravity is also slowing down m2's deceleration of m1's acceleration.

I feel like I'm so close, but I still don't quite get it :grumpy:

How do I solve this equation simultaneoulsy ?? I've always been bad with equations :tongue2:


Thanks for your time!
 
Last edited:
  • #6
You need to think about the forces. In the case of the 8kg mass, the tension is going to be acting in the opposite direction to the net force, so;
[tex]F_{net} - T= 8g \Rightarrow F_{net} = 8g + T[/tex]

In the case of the 6kg mass, the tension is going to be acting in the same direction as the net force, therefore;
[tex]F_{net} + T = 6g \Rightarrow F_{net} = 6g - T[/tex]

As the particles are connected the net force must be equal. Therefore, you can put the equations equal to each other. Can you go from here? :smile:
 
  • #7
Hootenanny said:
You need to think about the forces. In the case of the 8kg mass, the tension is going to be acting in the opposite direction to the net force, so;
[tex]F_{net} - T= 8g \Rightarrow F_{net} = 8g + T[/tex]

In the case of the 6kg mass, the tension is going to be acting in the same direction as the net force, therefore;
[tex]F_{net} + T = 6g \Rightarrow F_{net} = 6g - T[/tex]

As the particles are connected the net force must be equal. Therefore, you can put the equations equal to each other. Can you go from here? :smile:
You might want to rethink this analysis, Hoot. What do you mean by "net force"? The net force on each mass is not the same.

While you can analyze this problem in terms of the net force on both masses taken together along their direction of motion (as I mention in my post), I recommend analyzing each mass separately as mezarashi showed.

I suggest that joh attempt to solve those equations simultaneously any way he can. We'll correct any mistakes.
 
  • #8
Doc Al said:
You might want to rethink this analysis, Hoot. What do you mean by "net force"? The net force on each mass is not the same.

Ahh yes, I see my mistake now, the same one I always made in my exams :blushing: . The forces would not be the same but the acceleration would be. Therefore;

[tex]8a = 8g + T[/tex]
[tex]6a = 6g - T[/tex]

My mechanics tutor would crucify me:frown:

Thanks Doc Al
 
  • #9
Hootenanny said:
The forces would not be the same but the acceleration would be.
Right: Both masses have the same magnitude of acceleration (but different directions).

Therefore;

[tex]8a = 8g + T[/tex]
[tex]6a = 6g - T[/tex]
Almost. Consider the directions of tension force and weight for each mass.
 
  • #10
[tex]F = ma [/tex]
[tex]8g - T = 8a[/tex]
[tex]T - 6g = 6a[/tex]

It's all coming back to me now...:tongue2:
 
  • #11
joh
The masses are experiencing an attractive force from the earth, we call it their weight , [itex]W_1,\ W_2[/itex], both of these forces pull the masses downwards towards the earth. Since one of these are bigger than the other we have the same situation as with the cart. In this case the acceleration of the system (both masses and the string) can be calculated by using their combined mass in the calculation (Newton's second law) and the netto force on the system - the combined effect of the two weights.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
What is tension?

Is it uniform through that string?
 
  • #13
3trQN said:
What is tension?

Tension is a force exerted on a body (in this case the string) in such a way to stretch it, tension always acts towards the string and parallel to it. It is opposite to compression.

3trQN said:
Is it uniform through that string?

Yes, the tension is considered uniform throughout the string.
 
  • #14
Hootenanny said:
Yes, the tension is considered uniform throughout the string.

To elaborate on what Hootenanny said, tension is uniform in a massless string.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
siddharth said:
To elaborate on what Hootenanny said, tension is uniform in a massless string.
Not necessarily.

The sum of forces on any portion of a massless object must be zero, according to Newton's 2.law of motion and the requirement that accelerations remain finite.
 
  • #16
arildno said:
Not necessarily.

The sum of forces on any portion of a massless object must be zero, according to Newton's 2.law of motion and the requirement that accelerations remain finite.

But does this not imply that tension is uniform? If you take a small element of a massless string, then the sum of forces on both sides must be zero and as a result, the tension is uniform.
 
  • #17
Nope.
Consider an Atwood machine where the pulley has mass, and that the rope slung about it does not slide relative to the pulley. (I.e, there's static friction between the pulley and the rope).

Let the tension in the rope at an angle [itex]\theta[/itex] be given as [itex]T(\theta)[/itex]
and let the tangent and normal vectors at that point be given as [itex]\vec{i}_{\theta},\vec{i}_{r}[/itex], respectively.

Consider a rope segment of length [itex]Rd\theta[/itex], where R is the radius of the pulley.
The equation of motion for that rope segment is:
[tex]T(\theta+d\theta)\vec{i}_{\theta+d\theta}-T(\theta)\vec{i}_{\theta}+N(\theta)d\theta\vec{i}_{r}-F(\theta)d\theta\vec{i}_{r}=\vec{0}[/tex]
which can be resolved componentwise as:
[tex]-T(\theta)+N(\theta)=0[/tex]
[tex]\frac{dT}{d\theta}-F(\theta)=0[/tex]
where N and F are the normal and frictional forces per unit angle acting upon the rope segment from the pulley.
It is, essentially, the increase of the tension of the rope along the pulley that provides the torque which leads to the pulley's angular acceleration.

Thus, we see that the tension will be uniform throughout a massless rope, PROVIDED there is no other force than tension acting upon the rope segment in its tangential direction.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Yeah, I understand now. Thanks for that arildno.
 
  • #19
A guy on another physics forum told me this would be the equation for #2:

[tex]F_{tension} = 2g\frac{m_1m_2}{m_2+m_1} = 67 N[/tex]

And according to my book, his answer is correct. But I still don't quite understand how the heck he came up with that equation :grumpy:
I hope someone here can break it down for me, so it will be easier to understand, because I'm still a bit confused :blushing:

Thanks
 
  • #20
Yes, the answer is correct. Do you see where my two equations come from?

[tex]8g - T = 8a[/tex]
[tex]T - 6g = 6a[/tex]
 
  • #21
Hootenanny said:
Yes, the answer is correct. Do you see where my two equations come from?

[tex]8g - T = 8a[/tex]
[tex]T - 6g = 6a[/tex]
Ah, now I think it's a bit clearer.


[tex]m_1g - T = m_1a[/tex]
[tex]T - m_2g = m_2a[/tex]

[tex]F_{tension} = 2g\frac{m_1m_2}{m_2+m_1} = 67 N[/tex]


I see where they are coming from, but what I don't see is how this other guy knew to rearrange them in the way that they are in the correct answer. I'd need some more clarification on that part if possible, then I think we can move on to the next two assignments! :)


Thanks for your patience! :blushing:
 
  • #22
He just used manipulation to eliminate the acceleration. However, I think that it is easier to show the process if you do it this way;

[tex]8g - T =8a \Rightarrow T = 8g - 8a[/tex]
[tex]T - 6g = 6a \Rightarrow T = 6g + 6a[/tex]

Now as you have two equations which are equal to T, you can equate them;

[tex]6a + 6g = 8g - 8a \Rightarrow 14a = 2g[/tex]
[tex]a = \frac{2g}{14} = \frac{g}{7}[/tex]

You now have an expression for a, which you can substitute back into one of the origonal formulae (it doesn't matter which);

[tex]T = 6g + \frac{6g}{7}[/tex]

You know the value of g (9.81), so you can now solve for T.

Hope this helps :smile:
 
  • #23
It is not necessary to solve simultaneous equations if you follow my previous suggestion - which leads much more natural from problem 1. Consider the combined system of masses [itex]m_1+m_2[/itex] to experience a netto force equal to the two opposing weights of the masses. This will give one the acceleration of the system. Subsequently one can solve for the tension by applying Newton's second law to only one of the masses. These simultaneous equations should be avoided if possible.
 
  • #24
Hootenanny said:
Hope this helps :smile:
Thanks alot, that cleared it up for me! :approve:


Now, let's move on to the next two.

http://swear.1g.fi/files/phy/03.png

The picture is a bit unclear, y is the velocity in meters per second, x is the time in seconds.

The text doesn't specify at which points the tension should be calculated, so let's take it at say 2 seconds where the velocity is 0.75m/s and accelerating, then at 6 seconds where the velocity is 1.5m/s and constant.

[tex]F = ma[/tex]

What variables we've got:
[tex]m = 480kg[/tex]
[tex]v_1 = 0.75m/s[/tex]
[tex]v_2 = 1.5m/s[/tex]
[tex]t_1 = 2s[/tex]
[tex]t_2 = 6s [/tex]

Where do we go on from here??



http://swear.1g.fi/files/phy/04.png

I'm totally out of the loop on this one. I mean it can't be just about measuring the lengths ... can it? Hmmm ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #25
joh said:
The text doesn't specify at which points the tension should be calculated, ...
What matters is the acceleration; a different acceleration implies a different tension. Start by calculating the acceleration throughout the motion.
 
  • #26
Perhaphs it would help if we said [itex]a = \frac{dv}{dt}[/itex], thus we can redefine [itex]F = ma[/itex] as

[tex]F = m\frac{dv}{dt}[/tex]
 
  • #27
3. Use Newton's second law to setup the force equation for the elevator. You need to take direction into account in setting the equation up. Choose a positive direction and if something - force,acceleration or velocity is known to be in the opposite direction it is inserted as a negative quantity in the force equation. Unknowns are inserted just as symbols in the force equation. When the equation is solved for these unknowns the sign of their values will indicate in which direction they are. Since there is a down arrow in the diagram I think the intention is to take downwards quantities as positive (force,acceleration and velocity).
 
  • #28
3. From the velocity time graph you can see that at [itex]t=0\ and\ t=12\ s[/itex] the elevator stopped. In between these stages the velocity is positive, that means that the elevator was moving downwards (our "chosen" positive direction). If it was moving upwards the velocity graph would have been below the time axis (x-axis) giving negative velocities (in the opposite of our "chosen" positive direction).
 
  • #29
It seems joh got help elsewhere. If someone else would like to know how to get to the answers for these problems please indicate so - I am sure we will be too glad to help.
 

What are some common struggles with mechanics?

Some common struggles with mechanics include understanding concepts such as force, velocity, and acceleration, applying equations and formulas correctly, and visualizing how an object moves in relation to other objects or forces.

Why is it important to seek help with mechanics?

Mechanics is a fundamental concept in physics and many other scientific fields. If you do not have a strong understanding of mechanics, it can hinder your ability to solve problems and understand more complex concepts in the future.

Why is it beneficial to seek help from an 18-year-old Finnish student?

An 18-year-old Finnish student has recently gone through the education system and has a fresh understanding of mechanics. They may also have a unique perspective or approach to solving problems that can be helpful for struggling students.

What resources are available for students struggling with mechanics?

There are many resources available for students struggling with mechanics, including online tutorials, textbooks, study groups, and tutoring services. It is important to find a resource that works best for your learning style.

How can I improve my understanding of mechanics?

One way to improve your understanding of mechanics is to practice solving problems and applying concepts. It can also be helpful to discuss and explain concepts to others, as this can strengthen your own understanding. Seeking help from a tutor or mentor can also provide valuable guidance and clarification.

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
1K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • New Member Introductions
Replies
4
Views
531
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
754
  • STEM Academic Advising
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
Back
Top