Need help on length change due to temperature change question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the temperature change of the Taipei 101 building due to thermal expansion. The user attempts to apply the formula for linear thermal expansion but encounters issues with unit consistency and incorrect coefficients. They initially calculate a temperature of 73.56 degrees Celsius, which is flagged as incorrect by others in the thread. Key corrections include ensuring consistent units and using the proper coefficient of linear thermal expansion for steel. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate unit conversion and formula application in physics problems.
supernovaes
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Need help on "length change due to temperature change" question

Homework Statement



The tallest building in the world, according to some architectural standards, is the Taipei 101 in Taiwan, at a height of 1671 feet. Assume that this height was measured on a cool spring day when the temperature was 16.5 . You could use the building as a sort of giant thermometer on a hot summer day by carefully measuring its height. Suppose you do this and discover that the Taipei 101 is 0.465 foot taller than its official height.

What is the temperature, assuming that the building is in thermal equilibrium with the air and that its entire frame is made of steel?

Homework Equations



delta L = alpha*(L_0)*delta T (linear thermal expansion)
alpha = coefficient of linear expansion.

The Attempt at a Solution



I converted ft to meter and I looked around for the coefficient of expansion for steel and it was 0.000016 meters per degree Celsius.

(0.465/(0.000016*509.321))+16.5 = T_final
i got 73.56 and it was wrong, can anyone help? thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


The lengths you are using are not in consistent units. Either use ft or meters, but not both. Also, your stated units of the CLTE are not correct. They should be m/(mC), or, equivalently, ft/(ftC).
 
Last edited:


Looks like your deltaL is still in feet
 


Not to mention the temperature of your summer's day was a balmy 73.6 C, which is rather warm (165 F).
 
please help...from which book is this problem
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top