Need help on sources of magnetic fields

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic field at the origin from a current loop using the Biot-Savart law and Ampere's Law. It clarifies that the contributions from the two vertical wires do not cancel out, as both contribute equally to the magnetic field at point O. The correct approach involves calculating the magnetic field due to one vertical wire and doubling it, then adding the contribution from the horizontal wire. The final expression for the magnetic field at the origin is derived using integration and symmetry considerations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the geometry and symmetry in magnetic field calculations.
andrew410
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Consider the current loop in the figure below.
Figure: http://east.ilrn.com/graphing/bca/user/appletImage?dbid=1450953670

Determine the magnetic field (in terms of a, I and d) at the origin.

So I will use mu as the permeability of free space. Since the two vertical wires have opposite directions in current they cancel out, right? If so, then all I have to calculate is the horizontal wire. Well...I use the biot-savart law, but can't seem to get the correct answer. My answer is ((mu*I)/(4*pi*d))*(2*cos(pi/4)). Did I apply the law wrong or am I just totally wrong?

Any help would be great, Thx!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the two vertical wires have opposite directions in current they cancel out, right?

Actually, no. The wire with the current going up contributes the same magnetic field at point O as the wire going down (use the right hand grip rule). So determine the magnetic field due to the wire with the current going up (or down), double it, and add it to the magnetic field due to the horizontal wire.

In fact you can simplify the calculation even more with some clever tricks. The magnitude of the magnetic field at O due to the three wires in the diagram is the same as:

- The magnitude of the magnetic field due to one infinitely long wire perpendicular distance a from the point O (use Ampere's Law - easy), MINUS;
- The magnitude of the magnetic field due to a wire of length 2d & perpendicular distance a from the point O (use Biot Savart Law), MINUS;
- The magnitude of the magnetic field due to a wire of length 2a & perpendicular distance d from the point O (use Biot Savart Law again. In fact you can use the result of the previous step but swap a & d).

(think about why this is true).
 
Last edited:
s_a said:
- The magnitude of the magnetic field due to one infinitely long wire perpendicular distance a from the point O (use Ampere's Law - easy), MINUS;

The magnitude is (mu*I)/(2*pi*a).

How do you get the other two magnitudes?
 
Suppose you have a straight wire carrying current I, of length 2L, and the midpoint M of the wire is a perpendicular distance D from a point O where you wish to find the magnetic field.

Suppose OM is the line going from point O to point M (the line OM meets the wire at 90 degrees). Suppose you have another line OT, going from the point O to the wire and meeting it at point T (T is anywhere on the wire). Let @ be the angle TOM (the angle between OT and OM). NB: |@| < arctan(L/D)

Using the Biot Savart Law, the magnetic field contribution dB, due to the current element at point T is:

dB = μ/(4*pi) * I (dl x ř)/r^2 (NB: ř = r/|r|)
= (μ/(4*pi) * I / r^2) * sin(pi/2 - @) dl
= (μ/(4*pi) * I / r^2) cos@ dl

now dl = D*tan(d@) = D*sec^2(@)*d@, and r = D/cos@, so:
dB = (μ/(4*pi) * I / D^2) cos^3(@) * D * sec^2(@) d@
= μ/(4*pi) * I/D * cos@ d@

To find B, integrate dB from @=0 to @=arctan(L/D), and then double the result to get the answer (by symmetry).

B = 2 * μ/(4*pi) * I/D * Integral{0 -> arctan(L/D)} cos@ d@
= μ/(2*pi) * I/D * sin(arctan(L/D))
= μ/(2*pi) * IL /(D * sqrt(D^2 + L^2) )

Use this result. Side note: What do you notice when L is very large?
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top