Need help regarding transition dipole moment

semc
Messages
364
Reaction score
5
Hi, I have been trying to get the expression for the transition dipole moment of hydrogen but I am not able to get the expression. Hope someone can help me with that.

I want to evaluate \vec{d}(v)=<v|\hat{r}|0> where v is the free state and 0 is the 1s wave function for hydrogen.

\vec{d}(v)=\int dτ\frac{\alpha^{3/4}}{\pi^{1/2}}exp(-\sqrt{\alpha}r)(-ih\frac{d}{dp})exp(-ipr)

After integration by parts i got \frac{\alpha^{3/4}}{\pi^{1/2}}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\alpha}+ip}\right)^{2}

However, it should be \vec{d}(v)=i\left(\frac{2^{7/2}}{\pi}\alpha^{5/4}\right)\frac{p}{\left( p^2+\alpha\right)^3}.

Can someone point out where I went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
exp(-ipr)should be exp(-i{\bf p\cdot r}),
and -i\hbar\partial_p can just be {\bf r}.
Then you need angular integration.
 
Last edited:
Actually I am having trouble doing the integration due to the plane wave part since there is a dot product over there. I have been looking up the meaning of dipole moment and transition dipole moment but can't find much information. Is there any recommended books to read up on this? Thanks!
 
{\bf p\cdot r}=pr\cos(\theta). Then the angular integration is easy.
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top