Need help understanding this concept on field intensity

AI Thread Summary
Gravitational field intensity at a height of 300 km from Earth's surface is the same as if Earth's mass were concentrated at its center due to the properties of a perfect sphere. This principle applies only outside the sphere, allowing the use of point mass equations for calculations. The confusion arises from the distinction between mass concentration and gravitational field intensity, which remains consistent at that distance. The theorem can be verified through calculus by integrating the gravitational effects of small mass elements within the sphere. Understanding this concept is crucial for accurately calculating gravitational field intensity in such scenarios.
aeromat
Messages
113
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We are looking at gravitational field intensity in particular here, and using the Earth as an example. The question states: Calculate the gravitational field intensity at a height of 300.0 km from Earth's surface.

Why is it that: Since the point in question is outside of the sphere of Earth, the gravitational field there is the same as it would be if Earth's mass was concentrated at a point in Earth's centre. Therefore the equation for the gravitational field intensity near a point mass applies?

I don't understand how you could have the same gravitational field concentrated at a point, and it being the same even if you are 300km FAR FROM EARTH? Is this implying that the intensity is the same, because that doesn't make sense to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not the gravitational field that's concentrated at a point; it's the mass. A perfect sphere behaves gravitationally as if all of its mass were concentrated at its center, but only for points outside the sphere. As for why, you can use calculus to verify the theorem by calculating the gravitational field due to one small mass of volume dV, then integrating over the volume of the sphere.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top