Need help with a quantum chemistry problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a challenging quantum chemistry problem from "Modern Quantum Chemistry" by Szabo & Ostlund, specifically proving the theorem <K|H|L> = (N!)1/2 <KHP|H|L>. The original poster expresses difficulty in getting started despite reviewing the relevant chapter multiple times. A helpful suggestion is made to begin by writing both sides of the equation as integrals, which can be simplified into sums of single-particle wave function integrals to identify cancellations. The focus remains on guiding the poster towards a clearer understanding of the problem. Engaging with the suggested approach may help in progressing with the solution.
chemstudent09
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm really struggling on even getting started on this problem. I have read the chapter several times now and I have tried to understand the explanations in the chapter. But I can't even get this problem started. All I ask is if anyone knows how to do this, can you just get me started or point me in the right direction so I can then take it from there?

Thanks for any help.

___________
Prove the theorem <K|H|L> = (N!)1/2 <KHP|H|L>

where |KHP> is the Hartree product corresponding to the determinant |K>, i.e.

|K> = |Xm(X1)Xn(X2)...>

and

|KHP> = Xm(X1)Xn(X2)...

Prove this theorem
_______________

This problem is from "Modern Quantum Chemistry" by Szabo & Ostlund for anyone who is wondering.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I posted this question in the wrong part of these forums. I'm sorry about this.
 
Well, start by writing both sides out as integrals, which can be separated into sums of single-particle wave function-integrals, and see what cancels out.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top