Need help with a quantum chemistry problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the theorem = (N!)1/2 from "Modern Quantum Chemistry" by Szabo & Ostlund. The theorem involves the Hartree product |KHP> corresponding to the determinant |K>, defined as |K> = |Xm(X1)Xn(X2)...>. A key recommendation for tackling the problem is to express both sides as integrals, allowing for the separation into sums of single-particle wave function-integrals to identify cancellations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with Hartree products and determinants
  • Knowledge of integral calculus in the context of wave functions
  • Experience with "Modern Quantum Chemistry" by Szabo & Ostlund
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Hartree products in quantum chemistry
  • Learn about single-particle wave function-integrals and their applications
  • Review integral calculus techniques relevant to quantum mechanics
  • Explore examples of similar theorems in quantum chemistry literature
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum chemistry, particularly those studying the principles outlined in "Modern Quantum Chemistry" by Szabo & Ostlund, will benefit from this discussion.

chemstudent09
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm really struggling on even getting started on this problem. I have read the chapter several times now and I have tried to understand the explanations in the chapter. But I can't even get this problem started. All I ask is if anyone knows how to do this, can you just get me started or point me in the right direction so I can then take it from there?

Thanks for any help.

___________
Prove the theorem <K|H|L> = (N!)1/2 <KHP|H|L>

where |KHP> is the Hartree product corresponding to the determinant |K>, i.e.

|K> = |Xm(X1)Xn(X2)...>

and

|KHP> = Xm(X1)Xn(X2)...

Prove this theorem
_______________

This problem is from "Modern Quantum Chemistry" by Szabo & Ostlund for anyone who is wondering.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I posted this question in the wrong part of these forums. I'm sorry about this.
 
Well, start by writing both sides out as integrals, which can be separated into sums of single-particle wave function-integrals, and see what cancels out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K