Need Help with Abstract Algebra Please

Redhead711
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
My question is regarding abstract algebra.

Suppost that B is a 10-cycle.
For which integers i between 2 and 10 is
B^(i) also a 10-cycle?

I know that the answer is 3, 7, and 9 I just don't know
how you arrive at these numbers. If someone could explain the
process clearly to me I would greatly appreciate that.
Thank you sooo much. :-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The i are values that are coprime (have no common factors other than 1) with 10.

Here's a general proof:

Let's say we have some element g with order n. Then g^i has order \frac{n}{<n,i>} where <n,i> is the greatest common factor of n and i.

Proof:
({g^{i}})^{\frac{n}{<n,i>}}=g^{i \times \frac{n}{<n,i>}}
but
i = k \times <n,i>
for some k so
g^{i \times \frac{n}{<n,i>}}=g^{k \times <n,i> \times \frac{n}{<n,i>}}=g^{k \times n}=g^{n\times k}=(g^{n})^{k}=e^k=e
so the order ok g{i} is at most \frac{n}{<n,i>}

Now, let's say we have some j so that
e=({g^{i}})^j=g^{ij}
then, since the order of g is n
so n | ij (n divides ij)
so \frac{n}{<n,j>} | j \Rightarrow j \geq \frac{n}{<n,i>}

So the order of g^i is \frac{n}{<n,i>}.

In this particular case, you have \frac{n}{<n,i>} = n so <n,i>=1.
 
Thank you so much I understand much better now. I am very grateful for all your help.
 
I think that g has order 10 does not guarantee that g is a 10-cycle. If g is a product of two disjoint cycles of order 2 and 5, it can still have order 10. Is that right?
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
435
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
8K
Back
Top