Need help with an infinite series

mesa
Gold Member
Messages
694
Reaction score
36
I have a series that takes steps of '2' which requires an operation starting from n=1 to do the following,

@n=1 (n-1)!
@n=3 (n-3)!-(n-1)!
@n=5 (n-5)!-(n-3)!+(n-1)!
@n=7 (n-7)!-(n-5)!+(n-3)!-(n-1)!
etc. etc.

Any ideas?

*EDIT*
Come to think of it,
This problem would probably be easier to solve if we split this thing up into two infinite series where one only has positive terms and the other all the negatives and then put them back together after the fact. I tried this with something similar not too long ago and it ended with a solution.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So the partial sums of your series are

##0!##
##0! - 2!##
##0! - 2! + 4!##
##0! - 2! + 4! - 6!##

etc.? In other words:
$$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-1)^n (2n)!$$
Clearly this series does not converge, because the terms ##(-1)^n (2n)!## do not converge to zero. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the problem.

Also, in general, your proposal to split the series into positive and negative terms will only work if the series is ABSOLUTELY convergent.
 
jbunniii said:
So the partial sums of your series are

##0!##
##0! - 2!##
##0! - 2! + 4!##
##0! - 2! + 4! - 6!##

etc.? In other words:
$$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-1)^n (2n)!$$
Clearly this series does not converge, because the terms ##(-1)^n (2n)!## do not converge to zero. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the problem.

That is a wonderful solution but I should have specified this isn't a partial sum, that is what each consecutive term needs to be.

jbunniii said:
Also, in general, your proposal to split the series into positive and negative terms will only work if the series is ABSOLUTELY convergent.

This is only one 'part' of the solution, if you would like to see the remainder I could post it. As far as the technique, I used exactly the same method when deriving this guy,
$$ln(2)=\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} (-1)^n ((n!+n(-1)^n ))/(n+1)!$$
Although I should be careful about boasting, I still haven't checked this one outside of going over the derivation... :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
mesa said:
That is a wonderful solution but I should have specified this isn't a partial sum, that is what each consecutive term needs to be.
So is this what you want:
$$\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}\left(\sum_{n=0}^{m} (-1)^n (2n)!\right)$$
This doesn't converge either, because the inner series doesn't converge at all, let alone to zero.
This is only one 'part' of the solution, if you would like to see the remainder I could post it. As far as the technique, I used exactly the same method when deriving this guy,
$$ln(2)=\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} (-1)^n ((n!+n(-1)^n ))/(n+1)!$$
Although I should be careful about boasting, I still haven't checked this one outside of going over the derivation... :biggrin:
I think it would be helpful if you could post the full problem, because I think I'm still misunderstanding your question.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
jbunniii said:
So is this what you want:
$$\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}\left(\sum_{n=0}^{m} (-1)^n (2n)!\right)$$

Exactly!
But I want it all under one summation.

jbunniii said:
This doesn't converge either, because the inner series doesn't converge at all, let alone to zero.

Yeah, I am not surprised. This is only a portion of the numerator for the series so convergence doesn't matter (more on this below...).

jbunniii said:
I think it would be helpful if you could post the full problem, because I think I'm still misunderstanding your question.

I just happened to come across an 'opening' for an infinite series and decided to go for it. Here is how it needs to work,$$Pi=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} i^(n(n+3)) 4n(what we are working on)/(n+1)!$$

That 'i' part is not coming up correctly but it is supposed to be i^(n(n+3)) so the series will go ++--++--++--...

***EDIT*** Sorry, that is not completely correct, I forgot I already broke this piece out of a larger problem. The series should go (what we are working on) on two consecutive steps. In other words we would have,

@n=1 0!
@n=2 0!
@n=3 0!-2!
@n=4 0!-2!
@n=5 0!-2!+4!
@n=6 0!-2!+4!
etc. etc.

Sorry about that jbunnii, sometimes I focus so much on one part the others get temporarily lost :P
 
Last edited:
Well, here is what I have,

$$Pi=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} [(8n-4)/(2n)! \sum_{m=0}^{n-1} (2m)!(-1)^m+(8n)/(2n+1)! \sum_{m=0}^{n-1} (2m)!(-1)^m]$$

If I did the algebra correctly then this should be correct. I am not too happy about the 'summations within the summation' part but I haven't given up on that yet...

Aside from the equation suffering from a mild form of 'Rube Goldbergianism' what do you guys think?
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top