Need help with contraconcave mirrors

  • Thread starter Thread starter utkarsh5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mirrors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around creating a contraconcave mirror setup for a mirage illusion, involving two concave mirrors facing each other. The user calculated the aperture size to be seven times the focal length, seeking confirmation of this calculation and guidance on the hole size in one mirror. Responses indicate that the hole must be large enough to see the object clearly, emphasizing the importance of visibility rather than projection. The user plans to proceed with their calculations and has shared a diagram to illustrate their method, which involves geometric principles to determine the aperture size. Overall, the focus is on ensuring accurate dimensions to successfully create the desired optical effect.
utkarsh5
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
need help with contraconcave mirrors...

i saw the video of mirage illusion on the inter-net .it consists of two concave mirrors placed in front of each other such that focus point on each mirror is on the pole of the other mirror.one of the mirrors has a hole in between.i decided to make one for myself(as i can't get it here where i live).i calculated that the aperture of the mirrors should be equal to ?7 times their focal length(f*2.64).are my calculations correct?also,what size should i make the hole?i am asking this since i can't take risk of ordering wrong mirrors,since i can't get them here,so they will be costly.please answer.thanks in advance!
 
Science news on Phys.org


Welcome to PF.
The hole needs to be big enough for you to see the object. It is not a projection image - you need to be able to see a bit of the mirror for it to work.

I cannot tell if your calculations are correct if I don't know your calculations.

Compare what you plan with the following:
http://www.wfu.edu/physics/demolabs/demos/6/6a/6A2035.html
 


thank you for your answer!i am going to go with my calculations,and use the corresponding focal lengths(what's science if there is no risk?:smile:)as for the size of the hole,i am definitely following your advice.again,thanks!:smile:
 


as for my calculations,i have uploaded a rough diagram as an attachment.i used the mirrors as as part of two spheres,intersecting each other.since focal length is half the radius of curvature,the line segment joining the two centers is trisected,with each part equal to focal length.between the mirrors,f is bisected again (just an imaginary bisection,to ease the calculation).applying pythagoras' theorem,we get half of aperture = root7 / 2 times f.so, aperture is root7 times f.
 

Attachments

  • contracon.jpg
    contracon.jpg
    6.4 KB · Views: 469
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top