Need help with introductory analysis proof

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that for any real number 'a' and natural number 'n', there exists a rational number \( r_n \) such that \( |a - r_n| < \frac{1}{n} \). The proof presented utilizes the density of rational numbers in real numbers, demonstrating that there exists a rational number between \( a - \frac{1}{n} \) and \( a + \frac{1}{n} \). Participants confirm the validity of the proof while emphasizing the importance of the theorem stating that between any two distinct real numbers, there exists another real number.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with rational numbers and their density in real numbers
  • Knowledge of basic proof techniques in analysis
  • Concept of the completeness property of real numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the density of rational numbers in real numbers
  • Learn about the completeness property of real numbers
  • Explore proof techniques in mathematical analysis
  • Review theorems related to the existence of numbers between two distinct real numbers
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematical analysis, educators teaching introductory analysis, and anyone interested in understanding proofs related to the properties of real and rational numbers.

michael.wes
Gold Member
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
The question is in Wade's "Introduction to Analysis" 3rd. edition.

Question 1.3.4
Prove that for all real numbers 'a' and natural numbers 'n' there exists a rational number r_n such that |a - r_n| < 1/n.

(my) Proof:

|a - r_n| < 1/n
iff -1/n < a-r_n < 1/n
iff -1/n - a < -r_n < 1/n - a
iff a - 1/n < r_n < a + 1/n

Certainly, a - 1/n < a + 1/n, and both are real numbers by closure properties of R. Since I already proved that the rational numbers are dense in R, there exists a rational number between a - 1/n and a + 1/n, and we are done.//

Is this a valid proof or am I missing something? If it is correct, it seems that this is no more than an alternate statement of the density of Q in R, but I sense that I could be missing a subtler proof or point. Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, one problem is that you are starting with "|a-r_n|< 1/n" which is what you want to prove. You can do that if it is clear that everything you do can be reversed. That is, if this works (I'll let you decide that), then a better proof would be

Given a real number, a, and a natural number, n, since n> 0, 1/n> 0 so a+ 1/n> a and -1/n< 0 so a- 1/n< a. That is, a-1/n< a+ 1/n.

Now, do you have the theorem that "between any two distinct real number there exist another real number"? If so that's exactly what you would need- let r be that number.
 
That's exactly the answer I needed; and yes, I do have the result. Thanks HallsofIvy!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K