Need Help With Learning Slope Intercept Form(Not Homework)

  • Thread starter Thread starter mogilem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework Slope
AI Thread Summary
Slope-intercept form is a way to express linear equations, defined as y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. The discussion highlights the difference between slope-intercept form and point-slope form, with an example illustrating how to convert from point-slope to slope-intercept. The user expresses initial confusion but gains clarity through community explanations and resources, including a helpful YouTube video. They appreciate the guidance and feel more confident in learning about slope-intercept form. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding foundational concepts in mathematics.
mogilem
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So being as much of a simpleton as me I don't understand slope intercept form. I can graph simple linear equations like x=y+3 and things like that but I want to learn about slope intercept form and what it is(I have been entreating people like my friends, math teacher and parents to help me so this wasn't my first choice). Can anybody can please help me understand harder equations? As proof that I am not doing this to get the answer to a homework problem YOU get to design an equation for me. Now remember you are dealing with an idiot with -∞ I.Q so don't expect much.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Slope intercept form just uses the following fact: If you have a line, then if you pick any two points (x_1, y_1) and (x_2,y_2) you get that
\frac{ y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1} = m
where m is the slope of the line. In particular if I tell you the slope of the line and a point on it, let's say the slope is 3 and (1,5) is a point on the line, then if (x,y) is on the line it must satisfy
\frac{y-5}{x-1} = 3
where 3 is the m above, (1,5) is the (x_1,y_1) above and (x,y) is the (x_2,y_2) above. This equation is the point slope form of the line.
 
What Office_Shredder described is actually the point-slope form of the equation of a line. In his example the equation uses a point on the line (1, 5) and the slope (3).

The slope-intercept form uses the slope and y-intercept.

From (y - 5)/(x - 1) = 3, multiply both sides by x - 1 to get y - 5 = 3(x - 1) = 3x - 3. Add 5 to both sides to get y = 3x - 3 + 5, or
y = 3x + 2

Here the slope is 3 (as before) and the y-intercept is 2, which means that the line goes through (0, 2).
 
I get it now thanks. Just recently I found a good youtube video that I couldn't finish watching but showed me a lot that helped me understand. Now that I have a rolling start I can probably be able to solve and learn more about slope intercept form without difficulty. When I was first learning people would give me advanced equations without even defining what slope intercept form is. Thaank you for your help.
 
Mark44 said:
What Office_Shredder described is actually the point-slope form of the equation of a line

OK, I obviously need to get more sleep :redface:
 
Very happy the you mentioned this Office_Shredder because now I know what I should learn next. To the land of youtube that throws up a counterfeit of entertainment but can be used for good things to.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top