MHB Understanding Parabolas: Equation of Axis of Symmetry Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter DimeADozen
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the axis of symmetry for the parabola defined by the equation y=6(x+1)(x-5). The correct method involves using the intercepts, which are x = -1 and x = 5, leading to the calculation of the axis of symmetry as (−1 + 5)/2, resulting in 2. The confusion arose from misinterpreting the intercepts, with the participant initially calculating incorrectly. Clarification was provided that the intercepts correspond to the factors of the equation, emphasizing the importance of understanding the graph versus algebraic form. Ultimately, the correct axis of symmetry is confirmed to be 2.
DimeADozen
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've encountered a question that I need help understanding the answer to.

The question is:
What is the equation of the axis of symmetry of the parabola given by the equation y=6(x+1)(x-5)?

Now, I know this quadratic equation is in intercept form, and I know that the formula for finding the axis of symmetry for this is (p+q)/2

Which means that it's (1-5)/2
then -4/2
Which equals -2. But it says that the correct answer is 2, not -2.
I'm confused, is my formula wrong? Please help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That's because if $(x - a)$ is a factor of your equation, then the intercept is at $x = a$, not $x = -a$. So in fact your parabola has intercepts $x = -1$ and $x = 5$, and so you would get $\frac{-1 + 5}{2} = \frac{4}{2} = 2$ as expected. The formula itself is correct.

As an example, try plotting $y = x - 5$, and you'll see it intercepts the x-axis at $x = 5$, and not $x = -5$. In the same way, try plotting your parabola and see where it intercepts the x-axis.​
 
Ah, I forgot the rule for the x intercept. It's different when looking at a graph than it is in algebraic form. You've definitely helped me, thanks a bunch!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top