Need help with question regarding polarization filters

AI Thread Summary
Un-polarized light passing through two polarization filters with misaligned transmission axes results in 18% of the light being transmitted. The initial intensity of the light is halved after passing through the first ideal filter, leading to linearly polarized light. The calculation for the angle between the filters involves using the formula I = Imax(cosΦ)^2, but the correct angle is 53 degrees, not 64 degrees. The discussion emphasizes understanding how the first filter affects the intensity and polarization of the light. Clarifications and support were provided throughout the conversation, highlighting the collaborative nature of the forum.
ZHIHUI
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Moved from a technical forum, so homework template missing
Un-polarized light is incident upon two polarization filters and do not have their transmission axes aligned. If 18% of the light passes through this combination of filters, what is the angle between the transmission axes of the filters.

I got 64 degrees using I = Imax(cosΦ)^2 but the correct answer is 53 degrees.

Thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What happens when the light hits the first filter?
 
DrClaude said:
What happens when the light hits the first filter?
The light will be linearly polarized. If the first filter is ideal, intensity of the transmitted light will be exactly half that of the incident un-polarized light.
 
ZHIHUI said:
The light will be linearly polarized. If the first filter is ideal, intensity of the transmitted light will be exactly half that of the incident un-polarized light.
Correct. So how does that affect the terms in your equation?
 
DrClaude said:
Correct. So how does that affect the terms in your equation?
I got it!
Thank you very much!
Sorry for the trouble!
 
ZHIHUI said:
I got it!
Thank you very much!
Sorry for the trouble!
No trouble, that what PF is for!
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Effect of a polarizer/analyzer on partially polarized light
Replies
25
Views
3K
How can light be partially polarized?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Polarizing Filters Fraction of Light Passing Through
Replies
8
Views
2K
I What happens when circular polarization meets a diagonal polarizer?
Replies
20
Views
3K
Polarization of Light: Polarizer
Replies
7
Views
2K
Intensity of light passing through 3 polarizers
Replies
3
Views
6K
B Why do photon polarization experiments show similar outcomes in different situations?
Replies
11
Views
2K
Find % Light Through 3 Polarizers
Replies
6
Views
3K
What is the minimum number of Polarizers needed
Replies
3
Views
3K
Calculating Polarization Intensity: Theta Values of 45 and 25 Degrees Explained
Replies
3
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top