Need help with understanding an idea

  • Thread starter Thread starter fsoica
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Idea
fsoica
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello !

I'm just a passionate reader of popular physics books.
Often I'm in trouble understanding concepts and ideas.
hopefully this time someone here will help me...

I'm reading atm "From certainty to uncertainty", the book of David Peat.

He mentions in the first chapter about 2 clouds that darken the sky of classical physics at the end of the 19th century:
the luminiferous ether problem (I'm familiar with it)
and
"the problem of distributing energy equally among vibrating molecules"
(later on , "the way in which the energy is shared by vibrating molecules").

Since it has something to do with black body radiation, as the author mentions, i chose to ask the question in this category.

So, can anyone shed some light here? What problem David Peat is talking about ?

If someone could explain it in layman's terms, I'd be grateful...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
tks for your answer...I think you are right ...the author is probably referring to the ultraviolet catastrophe.

could you pls enlighten me a bit more about this so called "catastrophe"? I have an idea about the phenomenon, but I can't say it's all clear...

He (David Peat) writes later in the chapter about:

Waves can be of any length, with an infinite range of gradations.
By analogy with sound and water waves, the waves of light radiated
from a hot body were assumed to have every possible length and
every possible frequency; in other words, light had an infinite number
of gradations from one wavelength to the next.

I don't understand what this infinite number of gradations is about...
 
Last edited:
fsoica said:
in other words, light had an infinite number
of gradations from one wavelength to the next.

I don't understand what this infinite number of gradations is about...

I would take it to mean the the allowed wavelengths are not discrete, in other words if I have a range of frequencies F1 to F2, then every frequency in the range F1 to F2 is allowed. That means that, in evaluating the contribution of a range of frequencies, we have to use integration rather than summation.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top