Need help writing a joke equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1MileCrash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Writing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the misconception that more expensive paintball markers shoot paintballs farther, which is incorrect as all markers must be chronographed to 300 fps for consistent performance. A mathematical equation is proposed to calculate the distance a paintball can travel, factoring in the marker's price. The equation suggests that markers priced below 600 reduce range, while those above increase it, with specific limits on how much range can be affected. The user seeks a clean way to incorporate these price factors into the existing distance formula, possibly using an arctangent function. The goal is to create a simplified equation that accurately reflects the relationship between marker price and paintball range.
1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41
This is all done really fast for fun, may be some mistakes.

I'm a paintball player, and there seems to be a very prevalent misconception that certain paintball markers shoot paintballs greater distances than others.

This isn't true because before actually playing, your marker must be chronographed to be shooting 300 fps. Obviously if these two paintballs are roughly spherical, and are both traveling at similar velocities, physics doesn't care how expensive the paintball marker is.

Changing 300 fps to 100 m/s for simplicities sake, and assuming the paintball is shot from a height of 1.5 meters:

(I'm getting really frustrated with the math functions, so I'm typing it)

( 100 m/s ) √ (3 m / 9.8 m/s2)

Shows the distance, which comes out to about 55 meters. That seems close enough.

But I want to incorporate a new factor into the equation, the price of the marker.

We will say that anything below a value P of 600 will reduce the range given above, and anything above 600 will increase the range given above.

However at P = 100 the value should stop decreasing, and should decrease by no more than 30 meters. After P = 1600 the value should stop increasing, and should increase by no more than 50 meters.

Can anyone think of a simplistic and clean way to implement this? Perhaps modifying the 100 m/s?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How about something like an arctangent?

Just start with 600 + arctan(x) and scale such that it gives you the properties you want.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top