Need software for calculating primes

  • Thread starter Thread starter mesa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Primes Software
mesa
Gold Member
Messages
694
Reaction score
36
Does anyone have software I can run on my PC that can calculate primes to 8.0 x 1020?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
try Planet Source Code
 
phinds said:
try Planet Source Code

How do I register for the login?

****EDIT****Never mind, I just checked their facebook page and apparently the site is down due to a power outage until tomorrow.

Does anyone else have a source for checking primes to 8.0x1020?
 
Last edited:
phinds said:
try Planet Source Code

Planet Source Code is back online although it appears to be a site for people that know how to program which I do not (I am old school over here). Thanks for the attempt.

Does anyone else have anything?
 
Mathematica, or Wolfram alpha (http://www.wolframalpha.com) will calculate primes, but I doubt that they will go up to 8E20 in any reasonable time. It can calculate primes up to ~1E12 in a few seconds, but if I'm not mistaken calculating primes is approximately an O(N) algorithm, so it will take years to go up to ~1E20. What are you trying to do? Calculate all of the primes up to 8E20? Where would you store them?
 
phyzguy said:
Mathematica, or Wolfram alpha (http://www.wolframalpha.com) will calculate primes, but I doubt that they will go up to 8E20 in any reasonable time. It can calculate primes up to ~1E12 in a few seconds, but if I'm not mistaken calculating primes is approximately an O(N) algorithm, so it will take years to go up to ~1E20. What are you trying to do? Calculate all of the primes up to 8E20? Where would you store them?

Luckily I didn't need all the primes just something that can verify them up to that value but preferably much higher. I found this site,

http://www.alpertron.com.ar/ECM.HTM

So far it has been able to verify the primes I generated up to

125,024,575,647,509,552,016,558,656,041 and 125,024,575,647,509,552,016,558,656,167

Not bad at all. Unfortunately my calculator/pen and paper method do not allow me to go any further. Guess that will need upgraded next.

***EDIT*** found a better calculator.

New personal record for generating primes using calculator/pen and paper method is now at,

52,098,944,879,727,879,738,571,834,212,718,601,969,472,403,507,608,638,174,209,127

and,

52,098,944,879,727,879,738,571,834,212,718,601,969,472,403,507,608,638,174,208,761

and there you have it. Sorry for over-posting but these primes are a lot of fun!

****EDIT**** Calculator/pen and paper method,

Okay, one more time,

3,791,737,052,794,739,934,469,477,610,338,330,426,610,616,534,498,673,313,167,532,771,648,137,234,488,985,048,534,111,985,849,083,656,689

and,

3,791,737,052,794,739,934,469,477,610,338,330,426,610,616,534,498,673,313,167,532,771,648,137,234,488,985,048,534,111,985,849,083,657,093

Those primes are both well over a googel! Woo Hoo!

Not bad for pen, paper and calculator :)
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top