Need some clarification with torque or force and gear ratio

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between torque, force, and gear ratios in mechanical systems. A motor connected to a small sprocket can pull a load more effectively when using a larger sprocket, which increases torque while reducing RPM. Introducing a smaller cylindrical object concentric with the larger sprocket can further enhance pulling force, as a smaller radius increases the effective force applied to the load. The key principle is that torque remains constant across connected components, allowing for adjustments in force based on radius changes. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for optimizing mechanical designs for load pulling.
qpham26
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I have a question about gear ratio, sprocket or wheel ratio.

So let's say I have a motor with connect to a small output sprocket, and I want to use this motor to pull some load, so in order to do this I need to connect the chain with a larger sprocket, let's say 2 time bigger than the other. So this increase my torque by 2x while the RPM is 2x less.

Ok, now I want to generate more torque (not sure if I should say force), I don't know how to say this, but I want to stick a cylindrical object, concentric with the larger sprocket, but this cylinder will have a smaller radius (lets say 2x smaller), and a string that will connect this cylinder to the load (like an inner pulley). Would this increase the pulling force 2x as much as just using the larger sprocket?


Thanks and sorry for my lack of terminology.
This is why I can't find the thing I need by searching google =(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I want to stick a cylindrical object, concentric with the larger sprocket, but this cylinder will have a smaller radius (lets say 2x smaller), and a string that will connect this cylinder to the load (like an inner pulley). Would this increase the pulling force 2x as much as just using the larger sprocket?

Yes. Consider a winch... The smaller the radius of the drum the greater the pulling force but the slower the wire is wound in.
 
CWatters said:
Yes. Consider a winch... The smaller the radius of the drum the greater the pulling force but the slower the wire is wound in.

Thanks, and the reason that I get a greater force is because they spin together with the same ω the torque is also the same on both, but the radius is difference right?

and for chain and sprocket, what do they both have? The tangential force is the same right? but the larger sprocket have a bigger radius so it give more torque and slower rpm?
 
Yes. The basic equation is..

torque = force * distance (eg radius)

Gears on a common axle have same torque so treat that as a constant and you can rearrange it to give..

force = torque/distance

Change the distance (radius of the winch drum) and the force changes.

For sprockets connected by a chain...The chain tension (force) is the same so treat that as a constant..

torque = force * distance

As you change distance (radius of the sprocket) the torque changes.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top