Need to find the Ricci scalar curvature of this metric

chinared
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Need to find the Ricci scalar curvature of this metric:

ds2 = e2a(z)(dx2 + dy2) + dz2 − e2b(z)dt2I tried to find the solution, but failed to pass the calculation of Riemann curvature tensor:

<The Christoffel connection> Here a'(z) denotes the first derivative of a(z) respect to z.
\Gamma\stackrel{x}{xz}=\Gamma\stackrel{x}{zx}=a'(z)
\Gamma\stackrel{y}{yz}=\Gamma\stackrel{y}{zy}=a'(z)
\Gamma\stackrel{z}{tt}=b'(z)e2b(z)
\Gamma\stackrel{z}{xx}=\Gamma\stackrel{z}{yy}=-a'(z)e2a(z)
\Gamma\stackrel{t}{tz}=\Gamma\stackrel{t}{zt}=b'(z)
\Gamma\stackrel{}{either}=0

<The Riemann curvature tensor>
R\stackrel{x}{zxz}=R\stackrel{y}{zyz}=-a''(z)-[a'(z)]2
R\stackrel{z}{tzt}=b''(z)+[b'(z)]2

I tried to find the Ricci scalar curvature(R) from current result, but it gave a function depend on z. Is there any problem in my calculation?

Thanks for answering this question~!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't check your calculation, but why do you think the Ricci scalar shouldn't depend on z?
 
I got the same for the Christoffel symbols, but I got a lot more non-zero elements for the Riemann curvature tensor.
 
Sorry for that I did not write down the other non-zero terms of Riemann curvature tensor which can be deduced by symmetry and anti-symmetry properties.
However, I still have a contradiction that
Rt _ztz-b''(z)-[b'(z)]2
but
Rz_tzt=[b''(z)+[b'(z)]2]e2b(z)

Did you also get the same result?
 
I get

Rztzt = -[b''(z)+[b'(z)]2]e2b(z)
 
Last edited:
Thank you, I will check my result again
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top