Need to find the riemann curvature for the following metric

choirgurlio
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the Riemann curvature for the metric:
ds2 = -(1+gx)2dt2+dx2+dy2+dz2 showing spacetime is flat

Homework Equations



Riemann curvature eqn:

\Gammaαβγδ=(∂\Gammaαβδ)/∂xγ)-(∂\Gammaαβγ)/∂xδ)+(\Gammaαγε)(Rεβδ)-(\Gammaαδε)(\Gammaεβγ)

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the non-vanishing Christoffel components are as follows:

\Gamma=sinθcosθ
\Gammaθ=\Gammaθ=cotθ


My guess is that the middle terms disappear creating:
-cos2θ+sin2θ-(-sinθcosθ)(cosθ/sinθ)
The sinθ's cos2θ's cancel each other out making the answer sin2θ

Is this answer correct? My confusion is that I received this answer for the curvature for a different metric (namely, ds2=R22+R2sin2θd\vartheta). Will I always receive the answer sin2θ? I am not understanding fully what the Riemann curvature is...

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you find those Christoffel symbols? Since the metric is almost flat already, maybe you should try to find a coordinate transformation which transforms the metric to ds2=-dT2+dx2+dy2+dz2. Then it's manifestly flat and you know that the Riemann tensor vanishes.
 
Thanks for your help! I found the Christoffel symbols from an appendix in the back of my textbook. Yes, this sounds like it would work because the second part of the problem asks us to transform the metric into Minkowski form (I have figured this part out). However, I think the questioning is asking to explicitly show that the Riemann curvature makes the metric flat. I've spent hours trying to understand this Riemann equation and how to work with it, but I just can't seem to fully understand.

So working with the equation ds2=-dt2+dx2+dy2+dz2, would the Riemann curvature equalling 0 be equivalent to the tensor vanishing? If so, how would I show this?

I guess you could say that I am completely confused about the basic mathematics of applying the Riemann curvature on a metric.
 
So remember that the curvature tensor itself is independent of coordinates. You can write it as
R = R_{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta} dx^{\alpha} dx^{\beta} dx^{\gamma} dx^{\delta}.
Now, if for some coordinate system the componenents R_{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta} vanish identically, that means that the entire tensor is 0 as well, and the components must vanish in all coordinate systems.

The connection coefficients on the other hand do not form a tensor, so you may initially have nonvanishing connection, but then find a coordinate transformation which causes all \Gamma^{\rho}_{\mu \nu} = 0, and as Riemann tensor is proportional to the connection, the calculation becomes trivial.
 
This helps a lot - I really appreciate your help!
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top