Need to know about Surface Voltage

AI Thread Summary
When applying an electrical insulating material to a conductor carrying 25 kV AC voltage, the surface voltage on the insulating material can be estimated using a linearity assumption based on the depth of the coating. The breakdown voltage of the insulating material, tested at over 50 kV AC, indicates its capability to withstand high voltages but does not directly determine the surface voltage. To measure the surface voltage, a method that considers the relative voltage at different depths of the insulating material is necessary. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity regarding the reference point for surface voltage measurements. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate assessments in electrical insulation applications.
Arjun Mehta
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If we apply an electrical insulating material on a bare conductor which carries 25 Kv AC Voltage. What would be the surface voltage observed on the insulating material? Is there any test/method by which surface voltage can be measured on the Insulating Material.

The Insulating material has been tested for Breakdown Voltage of > 50 Kv AC, however a specific question of Surface Voltage has been asked in this case.

Will be great if someone can help me answer this query.

Thanks a ton
Arjun
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
:welcome:
There are a couple of problems with the way you phrased the question.
  • Surface voltage relative to what?
  • 50 Kv breakdown voltage should be Kv per meter, or Kv for a specified depth of coating.
But the simplest approach is to just assume linearity. If the coating has depth D, and if the outside is grounded white the inside is 25 Kv, then draw a straight line (0 volts, 0 depth) to (25 Kv, D depth).

More specifics might get a better answer, but based on what you gave us, linearity is the simplest.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top