Negating "For All" Statement: Proving False

  • Thread starter Thread starter keemosabi
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To negate the statement effectively, one must change all "for all" quantifiers to "there exists" and adjust the inequalities accordingly, specifically changing "<" to "≤". The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the conditions within the statement to apply these transformations correctly. Clarification is sought on the reasoning behind these changes, indicating a need for deeper comprehension of the negation process. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in logical statements and their negations in mathematical contexts. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately proving the original statement false.
keemosabi
Messages
109
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Negate the following statement and thereby prove that it is false.
[PLAIN]http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/5020/74520479.png

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I know the general rules but there are so many conditions in this statement that I don't know how to apply them.

My guess right now would be to change all the "for all" statements to "there existst" and to reverse the direction of the last inequality.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
keemosabi said:

Homework Statement


Negate the following statement and thereby prove that it is false.
[PLAIN]http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/5020/74520479.png


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know the general rules but there are so many conditions in this statement that I don't know how to apply them.

My guess right now would be to change all the "for all" statements to "there existst" and to reverse the direction of the last inequality.
Not exactly "reverse it". "<" should become "\le". Also that "there exist \delta&gt; 0" should become "for all \delta&gt; 0".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Not exactly "reverse it". "<" should become "\le". Also that "there exist \delta&gt; 0" should become "for all \delta&gt; 0".
Thank you for the reply. I'm just wondering how you came up with that. Could you elaborate a little please?
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top