Negative Force-potential energy relationship?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between force and potential energy, specifically why force is expressed as the negative derivative of potential energy (F = -dU/dx). It clarifies that when a positive force is applied to raise an object, the opposing force, such as gravity, is negative. Participants explain that the "F" in the equation refers to the force causing the potential energy rather than the force that changes it. This distinction helps resolve confusion about the negative sign in the equation. Overall, the conversation enhances understanding of how force and potential energy interact in physics.
SharKCS11
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I've been wondering for a while why force is the negative derivative of potential energy. In our books, they write that F=-dU/dx, and U=-W
I don't really understand why it should be negative. Doesn't the force need to be positive in order to increase the potential energy? For example, when you apply a positive force to an object (assuming downward is the negative y direction), Ug goes up, right?
I'm new to this forum, so sorry if I posted this in the wrong section...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SharKCS11 said:
I've been wondering for a while why force is the negative derivative of potential energy. In our books, they write that F=-dU/dx, and U=-W
I don't really understand why it should be negative. Doesn't the force need to be positive in order to increase the potential energy? For example, when you apply a positive force to an object (assuming downward is the negative y direction), Ug goes up, right?
When you apply a positive force, that means the force associated with the potential is applying a negative force. Using your example, while you exert a positive force to raise an object, the force of gravity is negative.
 
Oh, I see, so the "F" in the equation is referring to the force that causes the potential energy, not the force that changes it?
 
SharKCS11 said:
Oh, I see, so the "F" in the equation is referring to the force that causes the potential energy, not the force that changes it?
Right. For gravitational PE, the F refers to the gravitational force. Similarly for other conservative forces.
 
Ok, thanks. That cleared up a lot.
 
Welcome to PF! :smile:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top