Negative Force-potential energy relationship?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between force and potential energy, specifically why force is expressed as the negative derivative of potential energy (F = -dU/dx). It clarifies that when a positive force is applied to raise an object, the opposing force, such as gravity, is negative. Participants explain that the "F" in the equation refers to the force causing the potential energy rather than the force that changes it. This distinction helps resolve confusion about the negative sign in the equation. Overall, the conversation enhances understanding of how force and potential energy interact in physics.
SharKCS11
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I've been wondering for a while why force is the negative derivative of potential energy. In our books, they write that F=-dU/dx, and U=-W
I don't really understand why it should be negative. Doesn't the force need to be positive in order to increase the potential energy? For example, when you apply a positive force to an object (assuming downward is the negative y direction), Ug goes up, right?
I'm new to this forum, so sorry if I posted this in the wrong section...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SharKCS11 said:
I've been wondering for a while why force is the negative derivative of potential energy. In our books, they write that F=-dU/dx, and U=-W
I don't really understand why it should be negative. Doesn't the force need to be positive in order to increase the potential energy? For example, when you apply a positive force to an object (assuming downward is the negative y direction), Ug goes up, right?
When you apply a positive force, that means the force associated with the potential is applying a negative force. Using your example, while you exert a positive force to raise an object, the force of gravity is negative.
 
Oh, I see, so the "F" in the equation is referring to the force that causes the potential energy, not the force that changes it?
 
SharKCS11 said:
Oh, I see, so the "F" in the equation is referring to the force that causes the potential energy, not the force that changes it?
Right. For gravitational PE, the F refers to the gravitational force. Similarly for other conservative forces.
 
Ok, thanks. That cleared up a lot.
 
Welcome to PF! :smile:
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top