Why Does -3^2 Equal -9 Instead of 9?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RestlessMind
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative
AI Thread Summary
The confusion arises from the interpretation of the expression -3^2. In mathematical terms, -3^2 is evaluated as -(3^2), resulting in -9. This is because the exponentiation takes precedence over the negative sign. To square the negative number, it should be written as (-3)^2, which equals 9. Understanding the order of operations clarifies why the calculator outputs -9 for -3^2.
RestlessMind
Messages
173
Reaction score
0
I thought powers were things like (using the example in the title): -3 * -3 = 9

But when I enter -3^2 in my calculator, I get -9. I thought a negative multiplied by a negative was a positive. What's going on here?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


It squares the three before multiplying by negative one.

(-3)2 = (-3)(-3) = 9
-32 = -(3)(3) = -9
 


The calculator assumes that you mean -32, not (-3)2. Try entering 3, then using the +/- key to change its sign, then hit the square key.
 


Ah, I see! Thanks very much!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top