Net work and kinetic energy (pushing a wagon to accelerate it)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the use of work versus net work in calculating kinetic energy for a wagon. The original poster questions why their teacher used 500J of work instead of the 300J of net work they calculated. It is clarified that the net work done on the wagon corresponds to the change in kinetic energy. The impact of friction is acknowledged, as it does affect the wagon's acceleration, but the kinetic energy equation focuses on the net work applied. The importance of specifying the mass of the wagon for accurate calculations is also highlighted.
aqryus
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Bill does 500J of work on a wagon, friction does work of -200J. What is the final speed of the wagon if it starts at rest?
Relevant Equations
w=fdcostheta
Ek=1/2mv^2
I'm a little confused because my teacher used Bill's 500J of work for the kinetic energy equation and I don't understand why. I used the net work, so 300J, to find the speed and I'm not sure why that's wrong. Wouldn't friction make the wagon move slower than if there was no friction? So why isn't that accounted for in the kinetic energy equation to find speed? Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. The net work done on the wagon equals the change in the kinetic energy of the wagon. What did you get for the answer? Was the mass of the wagon specified?
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'

Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'

My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
View full post »
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'

Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'

The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Work and Energy on a Slope - How Does a Block Move Up with Zero Net Work?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Work done during a collision -- Change in Kinetic Energy & change in Momentum
Replies
1
Views
2K
Work energy KE theorem for a book being lifted up in a gravitional field
Replies
18
Views
2K
Friction and an object stopping
Replies
12
Views
3K
Kinetic Energy of a Cylinder Rolling Without Slipping
Replies
21
Views
4K
Combined Rotation and Translation of a Rectangular Plate
Replies
9
Views
2K
Finding kinetic energy and initial velocity of a cart over time
Replies
6
Views
2K
Minimal rotational kinetic energy for a gyroscope to precess
Replies
33
Views
3K
Conservation of Momentum Problem - Mechanical and Kinetic Energies
Replies
2
Views
972
Questions Regarding a Cat Going Up a Ramp
2
Replies
56
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top