Net work and kinetic energy (pushing a wagon to accelerate it)

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the use of work versus net work in calculating kinetic energy for a wagon. The original poster questions why their teacher used 500J of work instead of the 300J of net work they calculated. It is clarified that the net work done on the wagon corresponds to the change in kinetic energy. The impact of friction is acknowledged, as it does affect the wagon's acceleration, but the kinetic energy equation focuses on the net work applied. The importance of specifying the mass of the wagon for accurate calculations is also highlighted.
aqryus
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Bill does 500J of work on a wagon, friction does work of -200J. What is the final speed of the wagon if it starts at rest?
Relevant Equations
w=fdcostheta
Ek=1/2mv^2
I'm a little confused because my teacher used Bill's 500J of work for the kinetic energy equation and I don't understand why. I used the net work, so 300J, to find the speed and I'm not sure why that's wrong. Wouldn't friction make the wagon move slower than if there was no friction? So why isn't that accounted for in the kinetic energy equation to find speed? Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. The net work done on the wagon equals the change in the kinetic energy of the wagon. What did you get for the answer? Was the mass of the wagon specified?
 
If have close pipe system with water inside pressurized at P1= 200 000Pa absolute, density 1000kg/m3, wider pipe diameter=2cm, contraction pipe diameter=1.49cm, that is contraction area ratio A1/A2=1.8 a) If water is stationary(pump OFF) and if I drill a hole anywhere at pipe, water will leak out, because pressure(200kPa) inside is higher than atmospheric pressure (101 325Pa). b)If I turn on pump and water start flowing with with v1=10m/s in A1 wider section, from Bernoulli equation I...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K