Neutrinos carry away momentum, is it lost forever

bobsmith76
Messages
336
Reaction score
0
This is from my text:

The existence of the neutrino was first predicted in 1931 by Wolfgang Pauli, when certain nuclear reactions appeared to be violating the laws of conservation of energy and momentum. Rather than modify or discard the law, Pauli suggested that an unseen, chargeless and probably massless particle was carrying away some of the energy and momentum

My question is will this energy and momentum ever affect "normal" matter again? (normal matter being the stuff you and I are made of. It looks like neutrinos rarely interact with matter, so is this energy forever trapped in the neutrinos, never to effect matter again?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They certainly effected the matter of the Opera detector at Gran Sasso laboratory.
 
Yea, but that observatory seems to be set up to observe very rare and extraneous situations. It doesn't seem to relate to the "real" world.
 
If by 'real' world you mean the universe, I'd say that it's a part of it.
 
Neutrino momentum is a conserved quantity, according to QED. They rarely interact, but, that merely delays the inevitable.
 
From a practical perspective I think it is fair to say it is mostly gone forever, yes. I would expect most neutrinos will escape the visible universe before they interact with anything again, seeing as how it takes a few light years of lead to have a high chance of stopping one. I haven't checked any calculations though.

There could also be some gravitational effects which might affect things on the large scale, but I think even those are understood to be very small these days.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top