Comparing Neutron Bombs vs Nukes: What's the Difference?

AI Thread Summary
Neutron bombs, or enhanced radiation weapons, are designed to maximize neutron radiation while minimizing blast and heat effects. They achieve this through specific materials that enhance neutron output compared to other forms of radiation. Despite being developed during the Cold War, neutron bombs have never been used in actual combat, with no nuclear weapons deployed since World War II, aside from numerous tests. Their primary purpose is to incapacitate personnel while preserving infrastructure. Understanding their function and implications is crucial in discussions about nuclear weaponry and military strategy.
Marijn
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
Ok I've done quite some reading on neutron bombs.
What exactly is the difference between them in the way they work?

The way i see it now its a nuke, but not focused on heat/blast damage but radiation.
How does it work? Other material used?
And what isn't really clear to me is if they have even been used for real.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
And what isn't really clear to me is if they have even been used for real.
Since WW II no nuclear weapons have been used for real, although there have been many tests.

Neutron bombs are nuclear weapons with special materials to increase neutron output relative to photons (gamma rays and x-rays).
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top