Neutron Dipole Moment: Parity, Time Reversal Symmetry

jaycool1995
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have been wondering about a neutron dipole moment, though hypothetical what symmetries would it be violating, wouldn't it be Parity and Time reversal? If this were to be true, would it therefore make the statement below false and the word "inverted" would imply parity?

"T is the law of time reversal symmetry, if a particle were spinning and being filmed, then the footage were to be reversed and inverted, if the particle were perfectly symmetrical then in the reversed and inverted footage the particle would look as though it were spinning forward. If not this would prove that T-symmentry had been violated."

Sorry for asking so many questions ;)
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
!Yes, if a neutron dipole moment were to exist, it would violate both parity (P) and time reversal (T) symmetries. Therefore, the statement you provided would indeed be false, as the particle would not look as though it were spinning forward if P and T symmetries were violated.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top