Neutron Embrittlement of Pressure Vessels

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutron Pressure
AI Thread Summary
Neutron leakage from the reactor core contributes to fuel inefficiency and causes neutron embrittlement of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) wall, raising safety concerns that require careful monitoring and potential mitigation. Strategies to address these issues include adjusting core loading patterns to reduce neutron emission and increasing the water gap between the core and the RPV to enhance neutron absorption. The paper compares the approaches taken by German and French operators in managing neutron flux and RPV embrittlement, highlighting both commonalities and differences in their strategies. Additionally, it discusses the implications of gamma radiation, which poses significant challenges due to heat and biohazardous radiation. The findings emphasize the need for ongoing research and adaptation in nuclear safety practices.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,340
Reaction score
7,138
Neutron fluence at the reactor pressure vessel wall a comparison of French and German procedures and strategies in PWRs

U. Jendrich (GRS), N. Tricot (IRSN)

Abstract: While the neutrons within the core may take part in the chain reaction, those neutrons emitted from the core are basically lost for the energy production. This “neutron leakage” represents a loss of fuel efficiency and causes neutron embrittlement of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) wall. The latter raises safety concerns, needs to be monitored closely and may necessitate mitigating measures. There are different strategies to deal with these two undesirable effects: The neutron emission may be reduced to some extent all around the core or just at the “hot spots” of RPV embrittlement by tailored core loading patterns. A higher absorption rate of neutrons may also be achieved by a larger water gap between the core and the RPV. In this paper the inter-relations between the distribution of neutron flux, core geometry, core loading strategy, RPV embrittlement and its surveillance are discussed at first. Then the different strategies followed by the German and French operators are described. Finally the conclusions will highlight the communalities and differences between these strategies as different approaches to the same problem of safety as well as economy.

www.eurosafe-forum.org/ipsn/pdf/euro2_1_1neutron_fluence.pdf [/URL]

GRS - Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit mbH - is a scientific-technical expert and research organisation. - [PLAIN]http://www.grs.de/en/index.html

IRSN - Institut de Radioprotection et de Sureté Nucléaire - http://www.irsn.fr/ (click on English Version to the right)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Both neutron reflection as well as gamma ray reflection need to be looked into. The problem is that neutrons are a byproduct in current thermal-fission reactors, but in the future when more truley aneutronic fusion reactors are develped, the thermal neutron problem will be less severe. However, gamma rays are a large problem because every reaction, both fission and fusion unleash a few MEV of gamma rays. So for each nuclear reaction, gamma expels from the nucleus, and this builds up problems of tremendous heat and irradiation. These cause biohazardous radiation problems as well as heating the walls. Although gamma rays are a high frequency of electromagnetic rays on the EM spectrum than that of visible light, we should still look into reflecting them back into the system or using some form of photovoltaic energy production. Though most likely the rays will penetrate any normal matter, both heating and irradiating it...
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top