Neutron Star or a Pulsar - what decides

  • Thread starter kranav
  • Start date
  • #1
34
0
After a supernova what compels the left over core to be either a neutron star or a pulsar?
is it decided before or after explosion?
any thoughts would be appreciated.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #3
442
0
Whenever a type 1A supernovae releases it's remnants, if the left over rigid core doesn't exceed TOV limit then in that case a neutron star is formed. I suppose the difference between a neutron star and a pulsar would be on the scale of sizes of the magnetic field as hinted by jimmy's post.
 
  • #4
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,408
740
A pulsar IS a neutron star, usually very young, energetic, and spinning like a top. Its immense magnetic field is what causes the pulses.
 
  • #5
442
0
A pulsar IS a neutron star, usually very young, energetic, and spinning like a top. Its immense magnetic field is what causes the pulses.
Ah, I was under the impression that pulsars are old, neutron stars with high angular momentum. Thanks for your correction.
 
  • #6
98
0
Pulsars accrete surrounding matter onto their surface. The strong magnetic field of the neutron star funnels the matter onto the poles of the star, and bright hotspots are created on the surface. If a neutron star has nothing to accrete, there are no hotspots, and there is no pulsar.
 

Related Threads on Neutron Star or a Pulsar - what decides

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
31K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
21K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Top