Neutroscopic methods in General Relativity

Rade
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Smarandache is a well known crank.

By the way, the word is "neutroSOPHIC", not "neutroSCOPIC". It is, according to Smarandache's own words, a way to "interpret the uninterpretable".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Smarandache is a well known crank.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florentin_Smarandache interesting and different maybe, but on what basis do you call him a crank?

Garth
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Smarandache is a well known crank.
By the way, the word is "neutroSOPHIC", not "neutroSCOPIC". It is, according to Smarandache's own words, a way to "interpret the uninterpretable".
Thank you for spelling correction. Smarandache is not the lead author, the lead author and third author are physicists. I was just interested in hearing if there is any new physics in the merge of the two concepts,e.g, (neutrosophic theory) and (general relativity theory). I find that neutrosophic theory has overlap with neutral monistic philosophy of which I have an interest. Some might argue that quantum mechanics interprets the uninterpretable, no ?
 
Garth said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florentin_Smarandache interesting and different maybe, but on what basis do you call him a crank?
Garth

I was not particularly familair with this author, but

http://www.gallup.unm.edu/~smarandache/BeginAdventure.pdf

looks pretty cranky to me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
pervect said:
I was not particularly familair with this author, but
http://www.gallup.unm.edu/~smarandache/BeginAdventure.pdf
looks pretty cranky to me.
Agreed!

Garth
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top