New Developments in Bohmian Mechanics

unica
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
recently,i read some papers about bohmian mechanics.i want someone to introduce me the newest developments in this filed,thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
unica said:
recently,i read some papers about bohmian mechanics.i want someone to introduce me the newest developments in this filed,thank you
Unfortunately, an exhaustive review of the newest developments does not exist. For a brief overview of my own new contributions see
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0610138
 
Demystifier said:
Unfortunately, an exhaustive review of the newest developments does not exist. For a brief overview of my own new contributions see
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0610138

Hello, Demystifier, I don't suppose you'd take seriously a quantum hypothesis for a theory of everything that starts by assuming a Bohmian hidden variables theory?

See http://foranewageofreason.blogspirit.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Demystifier said:
Actually, I do. Especially when I recently found out that string theory can be derived from the assumption of Bohmian mechanics:
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/0705.3542

Actually I find my own theory of everything hypothesis at least difficult to reconcile with string theory because mine postulates large scale - rather that small scale - extra spatial dimensions where a cause acts nonlocally in addition to the forces, and which are deduced initially from quantum wave and entanglement behaviour.
 
I would like to know the validity of the following criticism of one of Zeilinger's latest papers https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.07756 "violation of bell inequality with unentangled photons" The review is by Francis Villatoro, in Spanish, https://francis.naukas.com/2025/07/26/sin-entrelazamiento-no-se-pueden-incumplir-las-desigualdades-de-bell/ I will translate and summarize the criticism as follows: -It is true that a Bell inequality is violated, but not a CHSH inequality. The...
I understand that the world of interpretations of quantum mechanics is very complex, as experimental data hasn't completely falsified the main deterministic interpretations (such as Everett), vs non-deterministc ones, however, I read in online sources that Objective Collapse theories are being increasingly challenged. Does this mean that deterministic interpretations are more likely to be true? I always understood that the "collapse" or "measurement problem" was how we phrased the fact that...
I keep reading throughout this forum from many members that the general motivation for finding a deeper explanation within QM, specifically with regards to quantum entanglement, is due to an inability to grasp reality based off of classical intuitions. On the other hand, if QM was truly incomplete, and there was a deeper explanation that we haven't grasped yet that would explain why particles tend to be correlated to each other seemingly instantly despite vast separated distances, then that...
Back
Top