New E&M Text by Wald - Princeton Press 30% Off

  • Context: Classical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MidgetDwarf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E&m Text
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a new textbook on electromagnetism (E&M) by Wald, set to be released in March. Participants express interest in the content and approach of the book, particularly its first chapter, which challenges traditional views in electromagnetic theory. The conversation includes reflections on the significance of the book's claims and its potential impact on understanding E&M.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants highlight that Wald's text emphasizes potentials as the fundamental electromagnetic variables rather than field strengths.
  • Others express skepticism about the novelty of the textbook, questioning what distinguishes it from existing literature on electromagnetism.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of Wald's assertion that charges are not the sources of electromagnetic fields, with some participants exploring hypothetical scenarios involving chargeless matter.
  • Some argue that the Maxwell equations allow for nontrivial solutions even with zero sources, suggesting that electromagnetic fields can exist independently of charges.
  • Participants debate the significance of gauge invariance in observables, with references to the Aharonov-Bohm effect and the role of potentials in quantum field theory.
  • There are discussions about the distinction between fundamental and observable quantities in the context of gauge theories and the Dirac field.
  • Some participants express a desire to read the first chapter and share links to previews available online, noting that Wald's approach may contrast with traditional texts like Jackson's.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion features multiple competing views regarding the significance and implications of Wald's claims. Participants do not reach a consensus on the novelty of the textbook or the validity of its foundational assertions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion involves complex theoretical concepts, including gauge invariance and the nature of fundamental quantities in electromagnetism, which may depend on specific definitions and interpretations.

  • #91
ergospherical said:
Cool! What are your first impressions of the text?
It is clearly a physics text, not a mathematical methods book. My one word description is “Clean”. He knows the path he wants to tread and he does not wander from it. It’s short with 225 pages of text, but it is more than just a set of lecture notes. If you do not know the math he uses, you will need supplementary material. That being said, the math doesn’t look scary. I think I will need to refresh my knowledge of Green’s functions. After thumbing through it, I am still looking forward to reading it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy, hutchphd and vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
Mine came about an hour ago. It seems very well formatted and logically presented. My first impression is that for me this is a perfect recapitulation. This means that there is not very much new to me (an old dog) yet I am certain I will learn a lot. Just like Christmas morning. If I find any major warts I will bring them up.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #93
caz said:
It is clearly a physics text, not a mathematical methods book. My one word description is “Clean”. He knows the path he wants to tread and he does not wander from it. It’s short with 225 pages of text, but it is more than just a set of lecture notes. If you do not know the math he uses, you will need supplementary material. That being said, the math doesn’t look scary. I think I will need to refresh my knowledge of Green’s functions. After thumbing through it, I am still looking forward to reading it.
It is literally lecture notes though. I was one of his students when he was making the book
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy and vanhees71
  • #94
Interestingly, the book has no references.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby and vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
7K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K