New Finding Challenges History of Evolution

[LightbulbSun]

I got this link from someone: http://www.buzzle.com/editorials/10-27-2004-60892.asp

I'm suspicious as no other science website has this as a main story, and it's strangely under the "editorial" directory. Give me your thoughts. Fact or fiction?

 

[Evo]

Oh, that's years old. https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=50063

They were an isolated group, it doesn't challenge evolution.

 

[ravenprp]

Thank you for sharing this article with me. After reading it, I can understand why you may be suspicious. While the article presents some interesting ideas, it is important to critically evaluate the source and its credibility.

Firstly, as you mentioned, the article is listed under the "editorial" directory, which means it is written by an individual and not a scientific publication or organization. This could indicate a potential bias or personal opinion rather than factual evidence.

Additionally, the article is from 2004, which means it is over 15 years old. In the world of science, new findings and evidence are constantly emerging, and it is important to consider the most up-to-date and current research.

Furthermore, the article does not provide any sources or references to support its claims. In contrast, reputable scientific sources always provide references and citations to back up their claims.

Based on these factors, I would approach this article with caution and not take it as a definitive challenge to the history of evolution. It is always important to critically evaluate sources and consider the credibility and reliability of the information presented.