New Quantum Physics Theories by 18-Year-Old: Seeking Safe Publication Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcgrissz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
marcgrissz
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello guys, don't frick out...
I am a 18 years old guy who is in love with Physics. I came out with some theories regarding quantum physics. I don't pretend to say they are right, and they are probably not. But i really want to publish them so even if they are not I will have some good reasons given by real physicists. I tried to publish them in this forum but one of the rules is that it is illegal to publish personal theories and I understand it.
If you can please help me to find a way to safely publish and take the merit of them, even if they sound all messed up to you.

Can anybody please help me? thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One possibility is to make the title "What is wrong with my understanding of quantum physics?". Then, under this title, you can write how you understand it, with expressions such as "my new theory" replaced by "my naive picture", or something similar.
 
Demystifier said:
One possibility is to make the title "What is wrong with my understanding of quantum physics?". Then, under this title, you can write how you understand it, with expressions such as "my new theory" replaced by "my naive picture", or something similar.
Is it safe? I don't want people to steal my stupid thinkings :frown::nb)
 
marcgrissz said:
Is it safe? I don't want people to steal my stupid thinkings :frown::nb)

Without exceptions, all revolutions / innovations in any field have been brought by people who were extremely well-versed on the previously established ideas. Even if your ideas have some good intuitions, most of them will be naive and thus wrong: you're asking someone else to correct them, so they would automatically take a lot of credit anyway. Study physics on your own until you can correct them yourself if you're so sure about them: so even if you find out they were wrong, at least you will have gained a lot of knowledge anyway. Win-win.
 
  • Like
Likes craigi
I'll be very direct:
marcgrissz said:
I came out with some theories regarding quantum physics.
No you did not.
If you have questions, feel free to ask them, but there is no point in opening the 2126th thread "I don't understand quantum mechanics but I think nature is like this". Seriously, no physicist is interested in reading the same misconceptions as "theory" over and over again. I am a physicist and I know how those threads look like.
I closed this thread.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
41
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
978
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
75
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top