I New theorems in undergraduate subjects

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter flamengo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Undergraduate
flamengo
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to deduce theorems besides those in the books of mathematics (I'm talking about consecrated subjects such as Calculus and Real Analysis, for example)? Again, my question is not at the research level. My question is at the undergraduate level. And if so, why are the Calculus books so standardized ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Depends on what you call theorems. Very general results of interest in many different applications, accessible with undergrad tools: see the textbooks. There are more that you can prove at an undergrad level, but they won't be that important and usually more specialized, otherwise they would have been added to the books.
 
  • Like
Likes flamengo
But I think that sometimes it's necessary to prove a new theorem or lemma in order to solve a problem or exercise. Is this true ? I think this occurs mainly in math competitions.
 
flamengo said:
But I think that sometimes it's necessary to prove a new theorem or lemma in order to solve a problem or exercise. Is this true ? I think this occurs mainly in math competitions.
These are usually auxiliary statements shaped to fit in the specific situation given and thus not very valuable in general contexts.

There are mainly two types of theorems in textbooks: those which reveal a deeper understanding of a theory and apply to several situations and those needed to prove them, which are often called lemma or proposition. However, there is no norm of how to call what. Some lemmas do actually belong to the first kind and are still called lemma, e.g. for historical reasons.

In the end you could construct any formula that applies to certain numbers and call it theorem. I once found the following funny formula on the internet: ##2^n+7^n+8^n+18^n+19^n+24^n=3^n+4^n+12^n+14^n+22^n+23^n \; (n=0,\ldots,5)##
I can't imagine anyone who would call it a theorem or even a proposition. And if it can be found in a textbook, then for the same reason as here: for entertainment.
 
  • Like
Likes flamengo
fresh_42 said:
In the end you could construct any formula that applies to certain numbers and call it theorem. I once found the following funny formula on the internet: ##2^n+7^n+8^n+18^n+19^n+24^n=3^n+4^n+12^n+14^n+22^n+23^n \; (n=0,\ldots,5)##
I can't imagine anyone who would call it a theorem or even a proposition. And if it can be found in a textbook, then for the same reason as here: for entertainment.
A method of generating similar formulas for even larger n ranges (but with prefactors) is discussed in this thread.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top