New to the board. Gravity questions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tommac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Board Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between gravity and the expansion of the universe, specifically questioning whether empty space can be curved. Participants explore theoretical implications of gravitational fields, the nature of spacetime curvature, and the effects of energy on these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Tom questions if empty space can be curved and proposes two scenarios regarding gravitational fields affecting the universe.
  • One participant asserts that empty space cannot be curved, citing General Relativity, which states that curvature arises from the presence of energy.
  • Another participant mentions that the dynamics of the universe are influenced by the density of material, even in a uniformly distributed scenario.
  • A later reply introduces the concept of zero point energy (ZPE) and questions whether it could impart energy to "empty" space.
  • Another participant clarifies that truly empty space would have zero zero point energy, linking this to the cosmological constant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether empty space can be curved and the implications of energy on spacetime curvature. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the nature of gravity and spacetime.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference concepts from General Relativity and cosmology, indicating a reliance on specific definitions of energy and curvature. The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of empty space and the effects of gravitational fields that are not fully explored.

tommac
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi,

My name is Tom. I am just learning about space and physics and how the universe works.
I have a question and I am not sure if I am posting it in the correct place or not so please let me know if I am posting it wrongly.

My question is about gravities relationship with the expansion of the universe.

The question is that could empty space be curved?

By this I mean either:
1) Can there be a gravitational field that permiates the universe as a whole. Maybe from the sum of small ( negligable effects ) multiplied over the numerous massive of the universe, dark matter, or using brane theory ... a source from outside our brane.
2) That space just has a natural 4d curve to it.


Now for number one above. If all of the matter in the universe has an effect on every single point in the universe ( even if it is negligable ) then at each point all forces would roughly even out so the direction of the gravitational pull would not exist, however the effect of the red shift would work.

Now the questions remains how much gravity would be needed to create the redshift needed for this effect. Since the curvature near a massive object greatly offsets the effects of universal expansion, I think the amount of curvature throughout space needed to produce the redshift should be within reason.

My question is how can I calculate the amount of gravity that would be needed?
How can I test this?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
tommac said:
Hi,

My name is Tom. I am just learning about space and physics and how the universe works.
I have a question and I am not sure if I am posting it in the correct place or not so please let me know if I am posting it wrongly.

My question is about gravities relationship with the expansion of the universe.

The question is that could empty space be curved?

This is a good question. The answer is a resounding no. Empty space cannot be curved. In the theory of General Relativity the presence of energy causes curvature in spacetime that leads to the effects that we call gravity. In empty space there is no energy hence no curvature.

tommac said:
By this I mean either:
1) Can there be a gravitational field that permiates the universe as a whole. Maybe from the sum of small ( negligable effects ) multiplied over the numerous massive of the universe, dark matter, or using brane theory ... a source from outside our brane.
2) That space just has a natural 4d curve to it.

To continue the answer from about, spacetime doesn't have a 'natural' curve to it, as I say it takes the presence of energy (of which matter is one example) to curve spacetime.


tommac said:
Now for number one above. If all of the matter in the universe has an effect on every single point in the universe ( even if it is negligable ) then at each point all forces would roughly even out so the direction of the gravitational pull would not exist, however the effect of the red shift would work.

Now the questions remains how much gravity would be needed to create the redshift needed for this effect. Since the curvature near a massive object greatly offsets the effects of universal expansion, I think the amount of curvature throughout space needed to produce the redshift should be within reason.

My question is how can I calculate the amount of gravity that would be needed?
How can I test this?

Note that redshift is produced by a combination of the receding motion of distance galaxies (the doppler shift) and the gravitational effect of the energy in the Universe acting on photons as they travel.

Now there is something important to realize. It might seem like in an infinite universe with matter spread out evenly then the effect of gravity of everything will cancel out and gravity plays no role. It turns out that this is not the case, not because of some strange effect of relativity, even in Newtonian gravity the same things happens. So the dynamics of the Universe is determined by the density of material in the Universe, even if it is dispersed evenly.
 
Wallace raises a point worth considering. In an observationally finite universe, CMB uneveness [anistropy] is guaranteed. In an observationally infinite universe, perfect gaussian distribution is guaranteed.
 
Wallace said:
In empty space there is no energy hence no curvature.

Wouldn't ZPE effect "empty" space and give it a non-zero amount of energy?
 
Yes. But truly empty space has zero zero point energy, i.e. the cosmological constant is zero. If the CC is not zero, then the space is not 'empty' from the point of view of cosmology.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K