New way to derive sectors of a circle (easy)

  • Thread starter Thread starter shadowboy13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Derive
shadowboy13
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
So for starters the area of an entire circle has 360º,right?

So we can say that: ##1∏r^2## is ##\equiv## to ##360º##

So by that logic ##0.5∏r^2## is ##\equiv## to ##180º##

And finally ##0.25∏r^2## is ##\equiv## to ##90º##

Divide both sides by 9, and you get : ##0.25∏r^2/9## is ##\equiv## to ##10º##

From that it's much simpler to multiply both sides by some variable.

Simple right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How is that any different to the formula on Wikipedia?
 
shadowboy13 said:
So for starters the area of an entire circle has 360º,right?
For starters, the area of a circle is not 360°. That's the measure of the angle of a sector.
shadowboy13 said:
So we can say that: ##1∏r^2## is ##\equiv## to ##360º##

So by that logic ##0.5∏r^2## is ##\equiv## to ##180º##

And finally ##0.25∏r^2## is ##\equiv## to ##90º##

Divide both sides by 9, and you get : ##0.25∏r^2/9## is ##\equiv## to ##10º##

From that it's much simpler to multiply both sides by some variable.

Simple right?
 
Try using \pi in your latex code to produce ##\pi## instead of using the product symbol.

If you want to find the area of a sector of a circle that has angle ##\theta## then multiply the area of a circle by ##\theta/2\pi## so

A=\pi r^2\frac{\theta}{2\pi}=\frac{r^2\theta}{2}

However, this assumes that the angle is in radians, but if you want to use degrees instead then just use the conversion

\text{angle in radians}=\text{angle in degrees}\times \frac{\pi}{180^o}

So the formula is then

A=\pi r^2\cdot\frac{\phi}{360}

Where ##\phi## is in degrees. So if ##\phi=360## which would be the entire circle, then as expected, you get ##A=\pi r^2##
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top