Changing Dot Product to Simple Multiplication

Halaaku
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
How does one change the dot product such that there is no dot product in between, just plain multiplication? For example, in the following:
eb.\partialcea=-\Gammaa bc

How do I get just an expression for \partialcea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here \Gammaa bc = ea.∂ceb
 
I have no knowledge of the particular symbols. However if you have the dot product of two vectors equal to a scalar, you cannot get one of the vectors from the scalar without further information. It is not enough just to know the other vector.
 
Halaaku said:
Here \Gammaa bc = ea.∂ceb

The partial derivative of the coordinate basis vector eb with respect to the spatial coordinate xc is a vector, which can be expressed at a given point as a linear combination of the coordinate basis vectors:

\frac{\partial e_b}{\partial x^c}=\Gamma^j_{bc}e_j

The \Gamma 's are the components of the vector. If we dot this equation with the duel basis vector ea, we get:
e^a\centerdot\frac{\partial e_b}{\partial x^c}=\Gamma^a_{bc}

The trick is to figure out how to represent the \Gamma 's in terms of the partial spatial derivatives of the components of the metric tensor.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Back
Top