Newton, Time Arrow & Egg Unbreaking: Is it Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ratzinger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Newton Time
AI Thread Summary
Newton's laws do not prohibit the unbreaking of eggs, but the second law of thermodynamics makes such events practically impossible. When an egg falls, gravitational potential energy converts to kinetic energy, which then disperses as heat and internal energy upon impact, leading to its breakage. Although energy is conserved, the second law prevents this energy from being harnessed to reverse the process and lift the egg back up. The discussion emphasizes that the arrow of time is governed by probability rather than physical laws. Ultimately, the unbreaking of an egg is statistically improbable, rendering it an impossible event in reality.
Ratzinger
Messages
291
Reaction score
0
Once in while I read that Newton laws do not forbid the unbreaking of eggs. The only reason that we don’t see it and similar events is the second law of thermodynamics.

Is that correct? If an egg falls off the table, isn’t then the reverse process also forbidden by Newton, then how should the egg shell and yolk go up against gravity and get to the table? Where should the energy come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ratzinger said:
Where should the energy come from?
Let's look at what happens when the egg falls. Gravitational potential energy is converted into kinetic energy. As the egg hits the ground, that kinetic energy goes into changing the internal energy of the floor and the egg (deforming aka breaking the egg) and into things like heat and sound.

The point is that energy is conserved according to the first law of thermodynamics. It would not be a violation of conservation of energy if all of that heat and internal energy went back into the egg to put it back together and give it enough kinetic energy to jump back up to the table.

However, like you said, according to the second law of thermodynamics that will never happen.
 
I also look at it this way: There is no "superball" that will ever bounce back to the same height as dropped(not throwing).
 
Ratzinger said:
Once in while I read that Newton laws do not forbid the unbreaking of eggs. The only reason that we don’t see it and similar events is the second law of thermodynamics.

Is that correct? If an egg falls off the table, isn’t then the reverse process also forbidden by Newton, then how should the egg shell and yolk go up against gravity and get to the table? Where should the energy come from?
The gravitational energy was converted into kinetic energy of the egg. When the egg crashed, that energy dispersed into the surroundings as heat, ultimately. It is still there. However, the second law prevents it from being used to do work to lift the egg back up to where it was.

If all the molecules in the surroundings under the egg suddenly moved in the same direction (up), the egg could move back to where it was. But it is statistically so improbable that it will never happen in 100 gazillion lifetimes of this universe.

So, the arrow of time is determined not by any law of physics but by the law of probability.

AM
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
885
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top