Newton-Wigner operator for K-G filed

  • Thread starter Thread starter paweld
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator
paweld
Messages
253
Reaction score
0
What is the probability of finding particle of Klein-Gordon field in some
region of space V (in an arbitrarily chosen inertial reference frame
at time t=0). According to me it is a following integral:
<br /> P(V) = \int_V d^3 x \overline{\psi^{NW}(x,0) } \psi^{NW}(x,0)~~~~<br />
where \psi^{NW}(x,t) is a Newton Wigner operator, i.e.:
\psi^{NW}(x,t) = \int \frac{d^3 p}{(2 E_p)^{3/2}}} <br /> \exp(i \vec{p} \vec{x} - E_p t) \hat{\psi}(\vec{p})
(\hat{\psi}(\vec{p}) is a Klein-Gordon operator in momentum representation)
On the other hand ususal Klein-Gordon field operator is connected to
its momentum counterpart by equation:
\psi(x,t) = \int \frac{d^3 p}{(2 E_p)}} <br /> \exp(i \vec{p} \vec{x} - E_p t) \hat{\psi}(\vec{p})

Notice that since the scalar product for \hat{\psi}(\vec{p}) is simply:
<br /> ( \hat{\psi_1}|\hat{\psi_2} ) = \int \frac{d^3 p}{(2 E_p)}} <br /> \overline{\hat{\psi_1}(p)}\hat{\psi_2}(p)<br /> ~~~~(1)<br />
then the scalar product for \psi^{NW}(x,t):
<br /> ( \psi^{NW}_1| \psi^{NW}_2) = \int d^3 x \overline{\psi_1(x,0)} \psi^{NW}_2 (x,0)<br /> ~~~~(2)<br />
in comparison to the expression for scalar product for \psi(x,t) which involves
some time derivatives:
<br /> ( \psi_1| \psi_2) = i \int d^3 x \overline{\psi_1(x,0)} (\partial_0 \psi_1)(x,0)<br /> - \overline{(\partial_0 \psi_1)(x,0)} \psi_2(x,0) ~~~~(3)<br />
This explains why we cannot assign probabilistic interpretation
to \psi(x,t) but we can do it for \psi^{NW}(x,t).

I wonder what happens if we consider negative energy states. Equation
(3) can be easiliy generalised for such solution of K-G eq. but it gives negative values.
What is the precise definition of NW operator for such states (accoridng to eq. (2)
norm of any solution is positive). Why some people say that probability of
finding a particles of negative energy (antiparticles) is negative? For me it doesn't
make any sense.

What are your opinion about it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The probability of finding a particle of negative energy (an antiparticle) is not negative, but it can be interpreted as an indication of the presence of a particle-antiparticle pair. This is because the Klein-Gordon equation is linear and so a solution for a particle of negative energy is related to a solution for a particle of positive energy by a sign change in the energy. Therefore, if we consider a wave packet that has both positive and negative energy components, the probability of finding a particle of negative energy will be equal to the probability of finding its particle-antiparticle pair. In other words, the probability of finding a particle of negative energy is not negative, but it can be interpreted as an indication of the presence of a particle-antiparticle pair.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top