Newton's Interpolation, numerical methods question

albema
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Can anyone tell me what is the equation for First Order of Newton’s Interpolation?

The one of Interpolation I know is Lagrange’s Interpolation such as

p(x)= \frac {x-x1}{x0-x1} f(x0) + \frac {x-x0}{x1-x0} f(x1)

and so on ...

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well...

well, i don't have math type on this computer, so you will have to bear with me, but:

the nth term is found by dividing the function evaluated at the n-1th term by the derivative of the function evaluated at the n-1th term and then subtracting that from the nth term.

that's it!
 
How can you find the nth term by subtracting something from the nth term?

The only Newton Interpolation formula I know is "Newton's divided difference" formula- which does not involve finding derivatives. It's a bit complicated to write out but here is a good explanation from Wolfram:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NewtonsForwardDifferenceFormula.html.

As far as "first order" is concerned, it is just f(x)= f(x0)+ (f(x1)- f(x0))(x- x0)/(x1-x0). Which obviously takes on the correct values at x= 0 and x= 1 and linearly interpolates between. If you look closely you will see that it gives exactly the same values as Lagrange's formula: all linear interpolation schemes between two points are the same.
 
wunderboy said:
well, i don't have math type on this computer, so you will have to bear with me, but:

the nth term is found by dividing the function evaluated at the n-1th term by the derivative of the function evaluated at the n-1th term and then subtracting that from the nth term.

that's it!

good point... should be subtracted from the n-1th term. bad typing on my part! thanks for noticing;-)
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top