Newton's Law of Gravitation vs. Gravitational Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the use of two equations for gravitational potential energy: PE_{G}=G(m1*m2)/r and PE_{G}=mgh. The first equation applies to large masses and varying distances, while the second is an approximation used near the Earth's surface. The potential energy between two masses decreases as they get closer, and the second equation is derived from the first under specific conditions. The factor g, approximately 9.8 m/s², simplifies calculations near Earth. Understanding when to use each equation is crucial for accurate physics problem-solving.
AznBoi
Messages
470
Reaction score
0
I'm confused about the two equations:
PE_{G}=G\frac{m1*m2}{r}

PE_{G}=mgh

When do you use either of these equations? Can these two equations be used interchangeably or not? Also, I think I remember reading somewhere that you need to use the 1st equation when the problem involves large masses and the 2nd equation when the problem is just talking about things on Earth.

Does anyone mind explaining when to use each of these equations and when not to? Why does it matter? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The potential energy of two (spherical) masses a distance r apart actually contains a minus sign such that the closer the two masses are the less potential energy they have. You might know that you can freely add a constant to this expression as only differences in potential energy are observable.

-G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r}

When close to the Earth's surface (r=R+h, with R the radius of the eart and h the height above the Earth's surface) you can approximate

-1/r \approx -\frac{2}{R} + \frac{R+h}{R^2} = -\frac{1}{R} + \frac{h}{R^2}

Using this in the above expression for the potential energy (with m_2 = M is the Earth's mass) we get

G \frac{m M h}{R^2}

plus some constant that can be ignored (as remarked above). Now, calling the factor

g \equiv G \frac{M}{R^2} \approx 9,8 m/s^2

we get the second expression for the potential energy near the Earth's surface:

mgh
 
Last edited:
So concerning your question, the second expression you quote is an approximation of the first (more general) expression. It is a valid approximation only close to the surface of some mass where the approximation I made in the above derivation is applicable.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top