Newton's law problem: Helicopter lifting a box with a rope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the forces acting on a box being lifted by a helicopter using a rope. The weight of the box is determined to be 4000 N, and the tension in the rope is analyzed using Newton's second law. It is clarified that the tension T in the rope can be expressed as T = W + ma, where W is the weight and a is the acceleration. When the acceleration is 2.5 m/s², the tension reaches 5000 N, which is the maximum before the rope would break. The key takeaway is that there are no additional forces acting on the rope beyond the weight and the tension created by acceleration.
Stell
Messages
3
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
A helicopter is carrying a box ( mass= 400kg) with a rope that can stand 5000N
a) what is the biggest acceleration that can the helicopter have (going upwards)
b)how should the helicopter move (upwards or downwards and with a=?) if the rope can stand only 3000N?
Relevant Equations
F=ma
Forces:
Box--> W(weight) and T(tension)
Rope-->T1(reaction of T) and T2(because of the helicopter)

So first i calculated Weight:
W=mg=400*10=4000N
In order to find the acceleration i should use Newton's 2nd law so:
(Box) : T - W = ma
T - 4000=400a

The problem is with the rope. We can exert 5000N to the rope. So, does this mean that T2 -T1= 5000?
And how can this help me since i don't know anything about T2.
At first i just thought that T1=5000 N, so since T1=T i calculated that
T - 4000=400a => a=2.5 m/s²
But then i realized that there is also another force applied to the rope (T2). So how can this be solved now?Can someone help me?
 

Attachments

  • 16328291322978634888540959981134.jpg
    16328291322978634888540959981134.jpg
    25.1 KB · Views: 150
  • 1632829222052489311920440616636.jpg
    1632829222052489311920440616636.jpg
    20.4 KB · Views: 151
Physics news on Phys.org
The tension without acceleration is T = mg = 4000 N. If the rope is just going to fail, its tension with acceleration is going to have to be T = 5000 N.
 
Chestermiller said:
The tension without acceleration is T = mg = 4000 N. If the rope is just going to fail, its tension with acceleration is going to have to be T = 5000 N.
Thank you for your reply. So, if i understand, that means a=2.5 m/s² ?
 
Stell said:
Thank you for your reply. So, if i understand, that means a=2.5 m/s² ?
Sure.
 
Stell said:
But then i realized that there is also another force applied to the rope (T2). So how can this be solved now?
There is no other force. If you solve the equation T - W = ma for the tension, you get
T = W + ma
Think of this expression as giving you the tension T in the rope when the acceleration is a for fixed weight W.
If you put in numbers, you get
T = 4000 N + (400 kg)*a
When the acceleration is zero, the tension is T = 4000 N.
When the acceleration is 1 m/s2, the tension is T = 4400 N.
When the acceleration is 2.5 m/s2, the tension is T = 5000 N.
When the acceleration is greater than 2.5 m/s2, the rope breaks regardless of the value of the acceleration.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2, Stell and Chestermiller
kuruman said:
There is no other force. If you solve the equation T - W = ma for the tension, you get
T = W + ma
Think of this expression as giving you the tension T in the rope when the acceleration is a for fixed weight W.
If you put in numbers, you get
T = 4000 N + (400 kg)*a
When the acceleration is zero, the tension is T = 4000 N.
When the acceleration is 1 m/s2, the tension is T = 4400 N.
When the acceleration is 2.5 m/s2, the tension is T = 5000 N.
When the acceleration is greater than 2.5 m/s2, the rope breaks regardless of the value of the acceleration.
Thank you for your explanation!
 
  • Like
Likes kuruman and Delta2
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top