Newton's laws and non inertial frame of reference

AI Thread Summary
Newton's laws do not hold in non-inertial frames because objects can accelerate without any external forces acting on them. To reconcile this, fictitious forces must be introduced, allowing Newton's laws to be applied, but complicating the system. These fictitious forces do not adhere to Newton's third law, leading to inconsistencies. Thus, while Newton's laws can be adapted for non-inertial frames, careful consideration is required. Ultimately, the laws remain valid but require adjustments to account for the complexities of acceleration.
raknath
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Hi all


Why do we actually say that Newton's laws do not hold for non inertial frames. can you folks give me an example of how Newton's laws collapse in an non inertial frame(if they do at all)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
raknath said:
Why do we actually say that Newton's laws do not hold for non inertial frames. can you folks give me an example of how Newton's laws collapse in an non inertial frame(if they do at all)

In accelerated frames objects with no forces acting on them accelerate. So you have to introduce "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_force" " to make Newtons laws work again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's not that Newton's laws fail it's just that in a non-inertial reference frame one cannot consider their system to be 'free of external forces' and things get complicated. However, it can all be worked out using Newton's laws you just have to be very careful.
 
A.T. said:
In accelerated frames objects with no forces acting on them accelerate. So you have to introduce "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_force" " to make Newtons laws work again.
And the fictitious forces do not obey Newton's 3rd law, so in patching the 1st and 2nd laws that way the 3rd law doesn't work any more.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top