Newton's laws of motion discussion question

AI Thread Summary
Kicking a large rock can hurt more than kicking a small pebble due to the differences in mass and the resulting forces involved. While Newton's laws indicate that the same force is applied to both objects, the larger rock requires more force to accelerate, which can lead to greater impact on the foot. The discussion highlights that the pain experienced is not solely dependent on the mass of the object but also on how hard the object is kicked. The impulse-momentum perspective suggests that the foot may bounce back more when kicking a heavy rock, contributing to the sensation of pain. Ultimately, the relationship between mass, force, and acceleration plays a critical role in understanding the physical experience of kicking different objects.
madah12
Messages
326
Reaction score
1
this is from chapter 4 of university physics of young and freedman
q19 why can it hurt your foot more to kick a big rock than a small pebble? must the big rock hurt more? explain?
but I can't see the answer at all by just applying Newtons law
in the scenario of the small pebble
mp is small
you apply a force F to the pebble it applies the same force on your foot and get ap = F/mp
and you get af=F/mf

incase of the large rock
mr>mp

but the same F is applied the acceleration =F/mr
and af=F/mf
so the acceleration of your foot is independent of the mass of the kicked object as I see and the only difference is that the pebble will get more acceleration so how by Newtons laws can I answer this question? is it related to other concepts? if so why ask it in the Newton's laws section?
 
  • Like
Likes Biki Balami
Physics news on Phys.org
You are assuming that you apply the same force to both pebble and rock. But which is most likely to require generating larger amounts of force? Which is harder to accelerate?
 
well in the question you only kick the rock you don't have to move it the same distance but ok if you want me to assume that you want to accelerate the rock the same acceleration of the pebble then the it would always hurt more to hit the heavier rock so the second part doesn't make sense...
but my point is that it doesn't matter why what do you kick because the force you will feel is the force you will apply right? the kicked object's mass only affect the acceleration "it" not the acceleration I would received right?
 
madah12 said:
well in the question you only kick the rock you don't have to move it the same distance but ok if you want me to assume that you want to accelerate the rock the same acceleration of the pebble then the it would always hurt more to hit the heavier rock so the second part doesn't make sense...
Imagine you have two identical-looking rocks in front of you. Unknown to you, only one is a real heavy rock, the other is just a light, plastic fake rock. You attempt to kick each one in a similar manner with a hard, swift kick. What happens?

As far as part 2 goes, it seems ambiguous. Does kicking a heavy rock have to hurt more? Of course not. Kick the rock very lightly; kick the pebble as hard as you can.
 
Doc Al said:
Imagine you have two identical-looking rocks in front of you. Unknown to you, only one is a real heavy rock, the other is just a light, plastic fake rock. You attempt to kick each one in a similar manner with a hard, swift kick. What happens?

As far as part 2 goes, it seems ambiguous. Does kicking a heavy rock have to hurt more? Of course not. Kick the rock very lightly; kick the pebble as hard as you can.

the light one will accelerate more while the heavy one will accelerate less
also how do we look at this from impulse momentum point of view? from experience when I kick a heavy rock my feet bounce back a little but if i hit a small one it goes forward so is the impulse at the first scenario bigger than the initial momentum but opposite in direction? while it isn't bigger in the second? does the fact the my feet bounce back have to do with the amount of pain my I feel?
 
madah12 said:
the light one will accelerate more while the heavy one will accelerate less
And what does that say about the acceleration of your foot?
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Stuck in understanding Newton's 3 laws
Replies
18
Views
2K
Empirical and Definitional Content of Newton's Laws
3
Replies
117
Views
9K
I Acceleration in Newton's second law
Replies
5
Views
2K
A question about Newton's laws & free body diagrams....
Replies
6
Views
2K
Newton’s Laws and Euler’s laws
Replies
17
Views
5K
What Is The Meaning Of Newton's Laws
Replies
10
Views
2K
What Is the Role of Inertia in Newton's First Law of Motion?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Galilean invariance: Newton's 2nd Law of motion
Replies
19
Views
10K
Do Newton's Laws Explain Motion and Inertia Anomalies?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Is true force just "accepted" if it satisfies Newton law?
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top