I Newton's rings at an oblique angle of incidence of light

AI Thread Summary
When light rays strike a lens and reflecting plate at an oblique angle, the interference pattern shifts from concentric circles to elliptical rings due to geometric factors. The differences in path lengths from the two surfaces create varying interference effects, with the path differences changing more rapidly in the direction of illumination. This results in narrower fringes along the direction of light and wider fringes perpendicular to it, leading to the observed oval shape. A simpler system of two tilted plane surfaces would show straight, parallel lines of minima. For a deeper understanding, further calculations may be necessary.
jokPAN
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Why do we get elliptical rings when the light rays fall obliquely?
Good day! Sorry for my bad level of English, but I got a question about the interference of light in the case of Newton's rings.
We know that If light rays fall on an installation consisting of a lens and a reflecting plate perpendicular to the surface of the lens, the interference pattern looks like concentric circles. But why do we get elliptical rings when the light rays fall obliquely? Cannot find anything about it on the net, so please help me figure this out.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hi. The reason for this is just the geometry of the situation. Interference maxes and mins are due to the difference in path lengths along any direction from the two surfaces involved. So, with one spherical surface and a one plane surface and a normal incidence of light, each curve of minima (say) on the patterns will follow a circle around the central point of contact.
If you consider a simpler system with two plane surfaces, tilted at a small angle, the lines of mimina will be straight and parallel to the line of contact. (Lines of constant path length difference.)
For a spherical surface, illuminated obliquely, the path differences will change quickest with distance for paths in the direction of the illumination (producing narrower fringes) and slower with distance in directions across the direction of illumination (producing wider fringes). This could be looked on as a combination of the two cases above so you would expect 'oval' fringes with spacing dependent on the angle.
Is that enough? Or do you want a formal derivation of actual elliptical fringes? If you want to go further then you may need to do your own calculations. What sort of search criteria have you tried for your query?
 
Thread 'Simple math model for a Particle Image Velocimetry system'
Hello togehter, I am new to this forum and hope this post followed all the guidelines here (I tried to summarized my issue as clean as possible, two pictures are attached). I would appreciate every help: I am doing research on a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system. For this I want to set a simple math model for the system. I hope you can help me out. Regarding this I have 2 main Questions. 1. I am trying to find a math model which is describing what is happening in a simple Particle...
I would like to use a pentaprism with some amount of magnification. The pentaprism will be used to reflect a real image at 90 degrees angle but I also want the reflected image to appear larger. The distance between the prism and the real image is about 70cm. The pentaprism has two reflecting sides (surfaces) with mirrored coating and two refracting sides. I understand that one of the four sides needs to be curved (spherical curvature) to achieve the magnification effect. But which of the...
Back
Top