Newton's Second Law — Net Force problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the application of Newton's Second Law in solving a net force problem related to a potato cannon. Participants critique the assumptions made in the problem, particularly the necessity of assuming constant force and acceleration. Key calculations include determining average velocity, time to terminal velocity, and the resulting force using the formula F=ma, with a final calculated force of 339.8 N. The discussion highlights the importance of precision in calculations and the impact of flawed assumptions on the outcome.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law (F=ma)
  • Knowledge of basic kinematics, including velocity and acceleration
  • Familiarity with SI units, particularly kilograms (kg) and Newtons (N)
  • Concept of pressure and its relation to force in projectile motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of constant vs. variable force in projectile motion
  • Learn about the design and operation of compressed gas systems for projectile launchers
  • Explore advanced kinematic equations and their applications in real-world scenarios
  • Investigate the effects of air resistance on projectile motion and how to account for it in calculations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and hobbyists interested in the mechanics of projectile motion and the design of launch systems, particularly those involving compressed gases.

adams_695
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A group of budding engineers made a cannon 1.0 m in length that shoots potatoes. They recorded the speed at which a potato could be launched. They measured it to be a constant 63 m/s over a horizontal distance of 1.0 m. The potato had a mass of 174 g. Assuming the potato accelerated from rest in the cannon, what was the magnitude of the force that the cannon exerted of the potato? (assume the potato hits a wall after 1.0 m and stops moving) (Answer to one decimal place)
Relevant Equations
Newton's Second Law/Third Law
working of Q16 2.png
working of Q16 2.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Posting your work sideways is bad form
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela and adams_695
phinds said:
Posting your work sideways is bad form

edited.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
phinds said:
Posting your work sideways is bad form

is the working correct from what you can see?
 
adams_695 said:
is the working correct from what you can see?
From what you have written you are relating the work done on the potato to its kinetic energy. That is correct if you are assuming that the friction in the cannon barrel is negligible. Since that is not stated you should mention it (you can get bonus marks for noticing things like that!). Your calculations appear to be correct. Good job.

AM
 
Last edited:
adams_695 said:
is the working correct from what you can see?
The question is flawed. It ought to tell you to assume the force applied is constant. If it is not then you do not have enough information to find the average force.
 
I'm just a biologist, but it doesn't look right to me. Close but no cigar. This is a time:distance problem and the correct SI units is kg not g. Thus:
average velocity: (63 m/s - 0 m/s)/2 = 31.5 m/s
time to terminal velocity: 1 m/31.5 m/s=.032s
acceleration to go 1 meter: 1 m= a/2 m/s^2 * t^2: rearranged a= 2*1/.032^2=1953.1 m/s^2
F=ma: F=0.174 kg * 1953.1 m/s^2 = 339.8 kgm^2 = 339.8 N
 
gingerjake said:
I'm just a biologist, but it doesn't look right to me. Close but no cigar. This is a time:distance problem and the correct SI units is kg not g. Thus:
average velocity: (63 m/s - 0 m/s)/2 = 31.5 m/s
time to terminal velocity: 1 m/31.5 m/s=.032s
acceleration to go 1 meter: 1 m= a/2 m/s^2 * t^2: rearranged a= 2*1/.032^2=1953.1 m/s^2
F=ma: F=0.174 kg * 1953.1 m/s^2 = 339.8 kgm^2 = 339.8 N
Your method ought to have given exactly the same answer, 345.3N. Since it did not, your more circuitous route must have introduced some rounding or arithmetic error. Try keeping more decimal places.
 
haruspex said:
The question is flawed. It ought to tell you to assume the force applied is constant. If it is not then you do not have enough information to find the average force.
As an object accelerates it takes more power to generate a constant acceleration. These questions are doubly flawed, therefore, as the assumption of constant acceleration is unlikely to be valid.
 
  • #10
I'm lucky I even got an answer. U R right, I truncated the 1/31.5 quotient before I squared it. Should have kept all 11 digits. {:-)
 
  • #11
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1305/1305.0966.pdf
See Fig 3 for real potato cannon pressure curves.

The force curves would just be the pressure times the cross sectional area.

Real physicists measure this stuff rather than calculate based on flawed assumptions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #12
PeroK said:
As an object accelerates it takes more power to generate a constant acceleration. These questions are doubly flawed, therefore, as the assumption of constant acceleration is unlikely to be valid.
It would just require a source of constant pressure gas applied to the chamber. A large compressor could do that quite easily.

AM
 
  • #13
Andrew Mason said:
It would just require a source of constant pressure gas applied to the chamber. A large compressor could do that quite easily.

In practice, no projectile launchers, including potato cannons work this way, because it's not really easy. A large compressor is not enough, one needs to design a system with adequate flow from the compressor to the chamber and also work out the details so that the flow is just right to maintain constant pressure. Most projectile launchers that use a compressed gas allow a fixed reservoir of gas to simply expand as the projectile is pushed in the barrel. The designs that are closest to having a constant pressure (thus a constant force) achieve this simply by having the reservoir volume large enough so that the final volume (reservoir plus barrel volume) is only a smidge larger than the initial volume (reservoir volume). But such a large reservoir volume introduces other issues of cost and size.

The other main approach is using combustion designs. Most of these reach a peak pressure before the projectile is half way down the tube and then the pressure drops.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #14
haruspex said:
The question is flawed. It ought to tell you to assume the force applied is constant. If it is not then you do not have enough information to find the average force.
It is an odd question. It omits necessary assumptions and it adds an unnecessary assumption about what happens to the potato after launch.

AM
 
  • #15
adams_695 said:
is the working correct from what you can see?
I think your solution is equivalent to one of a list of perhaps 2 or 3 methods that would get full credit.

One quibble about your worksheet: in one line you gave g as the unit where I think you knew, from how you converted the numerical part, is kg. That could cost you.

There were several comments about finer details, that were true, but I expect they were intended to be neglected. For example, in projectile motion problems, they often do not tell you to ignore air drag, but then give you no info regarding how to consider air drag.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
887
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
3K