1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Newton's third breakage in Goldstein's classical mechanics

  1. Feb 5, 2010 #1
    Newton's third breakage in Goldstein's "classical mechanics"

    I was reading Goldstein's Classical Mechanics vol.2 to brush up, and didn't get far before I got stuck. The book warns that both the weak an strong forms of the action/reaction principle can be broken when forces predicted by the Biot-Savart law are involved. The offending passage is partially copied below (page 6).

     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 5, 2010 #2
    Re: Newton's third breakage in Goldstein's "classical mechanics"

    It is not strange that this can happend in the case of relativistic force fields (like electromagnetism).

    Have you calculated the resulting change of angular momentum. Does the magnetic field have an angular momentum that you have not thought of?

    If you transform to a coordinate system where P1 is always at the origin, then you have transformed into a non-inertial referance frame. E.g. centrifugal forces and coriolis forces might explain your quandry?

    I haven't have time think about this, just throwing out some suggestions. Hope you sort it out!

    Torquil
     
  4. Feb 5, 2010 #3

    clem

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Re: Newton's third breakage in Goldstein's "classical mechanics"

    The process described there is the basis of the Trouton-Noble experiment.
    This is explained in <arxiv.org/abs/physics/0603110>.
     
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2010
  5. Feb 6, 2010 #4
    Re: Newton's third breakage in Goldstein's "classical mechanics"

    That's an interesting example which I hadn't thought about. Thanks for sharing that and your interpretation (which seems correct to me as well.)

    In the way the problem has been stated, I assume these particles have been fired out with some initial velocity and now they are moving without dissipation through a vacuum. Consider we sit in the rest frame of one particle. This particle feels the instantaneous electric field from the other particle. This induces an acceleration to the reference frame. This will manifest itself as the other charge taking a relative motion, which looks like an instantaneous space current. This current creates a changing magnetic field in the original reference frame due to the Biot-Savart law. This field induces a new electric field due to the Faraday's law, and so on.

    The presence of the magnetic field induces rotations due to the particle gyromotion -- charged particle trajectories rotating around magnetic field lines. (This is a basic, fundamental result of plasma physics.) The B field will point out of plane for the "left" particle (using the right hand rule for the BS law) but the B field will point into the plane for the "right" particle (using a similar rest frame analysis for that particle on the right.) Thus the particles will gyrate in opposite directions (assuming they are of the same charge) and this sense of angular momentum will be conserved. If the particles were differently charged, they would gyrate in different directions, but the original electric force would point in different directions, so you would still have oppositely oriented gyrations.

    Hence the angular momentum should cancel out. Sorry if this was long-winded. Of course, this sounds correct, but I think you'd have to actually calculate it to make sure it works out right. It's probably not exactly solvable for more than two particles.

    For more interesting info on relations between mechanical and e/m angular momentum, see the Einstein-de Haas effect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein-de_Haas_effect.
     
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2010
  6. Aug 15, 2011 #5
    Re: Newton's third breakage in Goldstein's "classical mechanics"

    Hello. I have just read the passage from Goldstein's text and have the same questions.
    I however also question the validity of Biot-Savart Law for point charges.

    If someone with a thorough understanding of the topic, who has gone through the same process of learning we are, could answer, it would be of great help.

    Thanks.
     
  7. Aug 15, 2011 #6

    clem

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Re: Newton's third breakage in Goldstein's "classical mechanics"

    The B-S law does not hold for point particles.
    The E and B fields for a constant velocity are given by (in natural units)
    [tex]{\bf E}= \frac{q{\bf r}}
    {\gamma^2[{\bf r}^2-({\bf v\times r})^2]^{\frac{3}{2}}}[/tex]
    and
    [tex]{\bf B}={\bf v\times E}
    =\frac{q{\bf v\times r}}
    {\gamma^2[{\bf r}^2-({\bf v\times r})^2]^{\frac{3}{2}}}[/tex]
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook