What Would the Rocks Be Rotating With Respect To in Newton's Thought Experiment?

chuckset
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure where this thread should go, sorry if it's in the wrong place.

In Newton's thought experiment about the rotating rocks going taut in deep space. With respect to what would the rocks be rotating?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An inertial frame of reference, of course.
 
chuckset said:
I'm not sure where this thread should go, sorry if it's in the wrong place.

In Newton's thought experiment about the rotating rocks going taut in deep space. With respect to what would the rocks be rotating?

If the rocks are in an otherwise empty universe with no other massive objects to relate to, then I guess you could use light as a frame of reference. If a laser is placed on one rock and aimed at a target on the other rock, the light would miss the target if the rocks are rotating. This is basically using a simple form of a Sagnac device to detect rotation.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top